Albums |
Screenshots |
Videos |
Communicate |
Friends |
Chalkboard |
3 pointers better than midrange now?
This is a discussion on 3 pointers better than midrange now? within the NBA 2K Basketball forums.
|
||||||
MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series | |
New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun | |
Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors? |
Search Forums |
Advanced Forums Search |
Search Blogs |
Advanced Search |
Go to Page... |
|
Thread Tools |
10-09-2015, 06:04 PM | #17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rookie
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
10-10-2015, 05:13 AM | #18 |
Rookie
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
For me midranges are a lot easier to make than 3's. But 3's are a bit easier from before.
|
10-10-2015, 10:37 AM | #19 |
Rookie
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
I remember 2k3 mid ranges were completely broken and all you could do was dunk or shoot threes. This year looks like its back to a similar style. Gotta make sure you're shooting mid range with mid range shooters I guess.
|
10-10-2015, 10:37 AM | #20 |
Rookie
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
I tell my opinion about defence and contested/open shots.
Also, now about defense, it's too simple contest shots, with lt trigger, and it's not real that EVERY contested shots has a grade "f", that does means never hits one (or almost never maybe...)mid or 3 point range jumper contested. In the real basketball players like, curry, harden, westbrook, anthony,lebron,kobe, and many other good offensive players, hit sometimes (who more often, who less...) contested mid range or 3 contested shots. Now, in 2k16 it's impossibile, always "F" grade, and always miss that shots, not real. In offline, maybe with awareness and consistence sliders, it's possible to adjust this, but online it's absurd. If a shots it's contested, you always miss it. I agree that if you defend well, the % of shots decrease, but now it's unreal, it's not decrease, but it's almost impossible. In nba you see good/great defense, but so many shots goes in anyway, in 2k no. I post the real stats, not my opinion, but real basketball. For example, talk about the difference between very tight contested shots (the most difficult shots), and open shots (the most simple), 2 and 3 points. look at the closest defender shots> 10 feet, not lay up within 10 feet: westbrook http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201566/tracking/shots/ 38% about contested 2 points shots, and 52% opens shots. 20% contested 3 points shots, and 37% open 3 points shots harden http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201935/tracking/shots/ 25% contested 2 points shots 44% open 2 points shots 25% 3 points contested shots, and 42% 3 points open curry http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201939/tracking/shots/ 36% 2 points contested shots, and 50% open 2 points shots anthony http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/2546/tracking/shots/ 42% contested 2 points shots, and 59% open shots 33% contested 3 points shots, and 50% open 3 points shots bryant http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/977/tracking/shots/ 33% contested 2 points shots, 45% open 2 points shots 12% contested 3 points shots 30%open 3 points shots butler http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202710/tracking/shots/ 50% contested 2 point shots, 49% 2 points open shots = he shoot better contested, lol 25% contested 3 points shots 37%open 3 points shots conley http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201144/tracking/shots/ 25% contested 2 points shots, 43% open 2 points shots 48% contested 3 points shots (tight, not really tight) 37%open 3 points shots redick http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/200755/tracking/shots/ 48% contested 2 points shots, 57% open 2 points shots 36% contested 3 points shots 47%open 3 points shots korver http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/2594/tracking/shots/ 41% contested 2 points shots, 58% open 2 points shots 50% contested 3 points shots 53%open 3 points shots rose http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201565/tracking/shots/ 45% contested 2 points shots, 50% open 2 points shots 18% contested 3 points shots (tight) 25%open 3 points shots paul http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/101108/tracking/shots/ 35% contested 2 points shots, 62% open 2 points shots 33% contested 3 points shots 41%open 3 points shots gay http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/200752/tracking/shots/ 44% contested 2 points shots, 70% open 2 points shots 20% contested 3 points shots 44%open 3 points shots lillard http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/203081/tracking/shots/ 46% contested 2 points shots, 47% open 2 points shots 17% contested 3 points shots 35%open 3 points shots t.evans http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/201936/tracking/shots/ 40% contested 2 points shots, 47% open 2 points shots 36% contested 3 points shots (tight)35%open 3 points shots beal http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/203078/tracking/shots/ 19% contested 2 points shots, 25% open 2 points shots 44% contested 3 points shots(tight) 39%open 3 points shots also big men: davis http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/203076/tracking/shots/ 36% contested 2 points shots, 49% open 2 points shots bosh http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/2547/tracking/shots/ 42% contested 2 points shots, 57% open 2 points shots cousins http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/202326/tracking/shots/ 58% contested 2 points shots, 42% open 2 points shots randolph http://stats.nba.com/player/#!/2216/tracking/shots/ 54% contested 2 points shots, 34% open 2 points shots = he shoots really better in contested shots some other consideration about this: - it's not real that in nba2k16 a really tight shot has a 0-5% success % of 2-3 point shots, and always grade f. - it's not real that players have enormous different between contested or open shots, in reality every player has difference, big or small, and somebody shoots better contested than open shot. in every case no real the situation in the game now - there are really bit very tight 2-3 point shots in the reality (except randolph, and some others...), in the game with lt trigger it's too simple contested very tight a shot > 10 feet, and there are so many contested shots. - i talked only about the difference between very tught, and very open, but the difference it's less if consider a tight, and not very tight. - about the midrange the better player in the league is chris paul, 62% open mid range, irrealistic if somebody shoots 65-70% or more, not in one match, but after several games. - i talked about some players, but this happens almost to every player,also not really good player, sure for the good offensive player. in the 2k it's totally wrong and unrealistic. so, 2k guys, you have to consider this, and change the success shot, and the attributes about every player on offensive end, consistency, awareness, about 2-3 point shots. now, it works really really bad. cheers and sorry for my bad english. Last edited by lelets; 10-10-2015 at 10:57 AM. |
10-10-2015, 10:58 AM | #21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MVP
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
Tightly contested shots are not the contested shot percentages you're listing. Those are moderately-to-lightly contested shots. Tightly contested shots have a very low rate of accuracy in the NBA and are not often taken (1.7% of all shots or so). The average for an open shot is around 45% from midrange and 40% from three. The average for a contested shot (2-4 feet) is 30% from three. It goes down drastically when it's tightly contested. (Probably in the teens or lower). So the issue with 2K is that too many moderately contested or lightly contested shots are being treated like tightly contested shots. Tightly contested shots should certainly NOT fall at 30-40%. That would be disastrous. Also players like cousins and Randolph don't just shoot better contested. It's the type of shots they're taking because they're low post players and shoot better out of a post move usually with a defender close. They're not as great as face up open jumper takers. Just giving them a high contested shot accuracy in all situations would also be a bad adjustment.
TMagic likes this.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Advertisements - Register to remove | ||
|
10-10-2015, 11:06 AM | #22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rookie
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
i written that in the nba very tight contested shots are bit frequent, yes, 1,7 %read it. in the game it's too simple contested shots very tight, with lt trigger, so than real nba there are too many contested shots really tight, and % are near at 0, but in the reality it's not so low. 10% o rlower? lol, look at my link, i write the exact % about really tight 2-3 point shots. About big men, randolph it's a perfect tipe of player that shoots very well nearfrom the basket when it's heavy contested. so, i repeat, it's not real that so many shots have grade "F" and nothing goes in, in the reality that shots are not "f", or they hit more often. Last edited by lelets; 10-10-2015 at 11:12 AM. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
10-10-2015, 11:21 AM | #23 |
MVP
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
Once 2K implements open, and contested ratings into the game I think the game overall will really shine. I think the problem is mainly the ability to get green releases causes the success rate to fluctuate from being too easy. I still think they should get away from excellent releases being "money" and more about excellent releases are the peak of the shot success rate based off stats
Combine that with the on ball defense that is played and you would see more normal contested jumpers at a realistic rate. Basically the way certain players attack off the dribble make it extra hard to tightly contest without fouling on a good amount of possessions. |
10-10-2015, 11:31 AM | #24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rookie
|
Re: 3 pointers better than midrange now?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
«
Operation Sports Forums
> Basketball
> NBA 2K Basketball
»
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:41 PM.
Top -
|