Does Steph Curry Justify Greater Than an 99 Overall Rating?

[BA2929]

Quote: Originally Posted by jeebs9

That might be a bot man... More and more everyday smh

Yea, you're right. I didn't even look at the name when I responded.

Someone probably said that though, so my point still stands, I suppose. Even if I replied to a computer lol

[jeebs9]

Quote: Originally Posted by BA2929

Yea, you're right. I didn't even look at the name when I responded. Someone probably said that though, so my point still stands, I suppose. Even if I replied to a computer lol

Don't worry its been happening to me a lot lately. Just the other day I replied to a bot. But said "I know your a bot. But I'm going to answer your question" Hahaha Like I said it's pretty damn good bot.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[A6_Foul_Out]

That's the thing as well.

Making Curry's rating 99 or 102 or 110 doesn't really matter. The little kids who this will "hype up" will still be just as bad with his character in-game. running left and right shooting red shots.

The people that actually know how to use the character would just as effective with his base card or base dynamic.

[MoneyOvaHuds]

This is the stuff curry does on defense https://twitter.com/ten000hours/stat...78774493249536


He's also a smart team defender

He's just solid no liability, of course certain matchups he will be outmatched but that can be said about anyone

[LO6IX]

He's rated pretty accurately. Best shooter in the game, great finishing, good defence, good rebounding, passing is a little overrated. Only prime MJ and Miami Heat LeBron should have 98-99 ratings imo.

[E The Rhymer]

Quote: Originally Posted by LO6IX

He's rated pretty accurately. Best shooter in the game, great finishing, good defence, good rebounding, passing is a little overrated. Only prime MJ and Miami Heat LeBron should have 98-99 ratings imo.

No Kobe? No Wilt? No Kareem?

[LO6IX]

Quote: Originally Posted by E The Rhymer

No Kobe? No Wilt? No Kareem?

LeBron and MJ are better and more complete players imo.

[jfsolo]

The best OV that I would give any player in any season that we've seen so far is probably a 95. IMO, to be rated higher than that a player would need to be in the top ten in basically every statistical measurement on both offense and defense in the league for that year. To get a 99 you would need to be in the top three.

Great for your position or size, isn't a compelling argument.