I think most will agree that 2K takes the cake for next gen graphics. However, NBA Live is being written off prematurely. It's the animations that are the problem. They just don't look right. Basketball players don't move like that. But the court, the player models, that's fine. Everything is just too far away to appreciate it. Even some of the faces look good when zoomed in. The level of detail on tattoos is great (something I don't really care about).
This thought occurred to me because I happened to see some kids playing Live on XBone in the Microsoft Store. The television appeared to be 1080P LED. Huge screen. For a brief second, I thought it was 2K until I saw the ESPN overlay. But on that screen, the camera looked closer to the action than I'm accustomed to when I play (my TV is only 720). Of course after watching them for a few minutes it became obvious that it was Live (I'm not trying to say Live looks better than or is even close to the graphics of 2K, so let's not start that argument).
Maybe this game will look even better if given the opportunity. I think EA shot themselves in the foot by providing such limited camera options.
This thought occurred to me because I happened to see some kids playing Live on XBone in the Microsoft Store. The television appeared to be 1080P LED. Huge screen. For a brief second, I thought it was 2K until I saw the ESPN overlay. But on that screen, the camera looked closer to the action than I'm accustomed to when I play (my TV is only 720). Of course after watching them for a few minutes it became obvious that it was Live (I'm not trying to say Live looks better than or is even close to the graphics of 2K, so let's not start that argument).
Maybe this game will look even better if given the opportunity. I think EA shot themselves in the foot by providing such limited camera options.
Comment