Serious roster errors....please read

[BRAMVILL]

I am interested in seeing these. I just sent you a request. GT is villdaboss

[jkra0512]

So I stayed up until about 12:30 last night going through these and I got to I think Montana St. Woke up today and realized I NEVER SAVED!!! Anyway, I'll be sending you a friend request from jkra0512, I'll be needing these.

[HustlinOwl]

I seen this awhile ago prior to the game being released, but if you look at all the teams there are players on the roster with a 99 for offensive awareness. The bigger schools have more players rated higher than the smaller schools, so how is this an issue? Duke's roster lowest rated player the tenth man is 75 and the rest are 84 and above same with UNC most players are 91 or higher

[countryboy]

Quote: Originally Posted by HustlinOwl

I seen this awhile ago prior to the game being released, but if you look at all the teams there are players on the roster with a 99 for offensive awareness. The bigger schools have more players rated higher than the smaller schools, so how is this an issue? Duke's roster lowest rated player the tenth man is 75 and the rest are 84 and above same with UNC most players are 91 or higher

I agree with Hustlin, I don't view this as an issue. I'm not sure that player ratings will make a difference as to where and when upsets happen, especially if its only one player. Also, once you get past the first season, then every thing is subjective as teams recruit better players.

In my dynasty UNC has one loss and there isn't really any surprises other than Pitt being 7-7 now after I beat them. They've lost some games you wouldn't expect, but no one else really stands out like a sore thumb.

Besides, I'd much rather have upsets then not. Just my .02

[Jason2112]

I have just finished editing starting lineups and ratings to be realistic to their real life counterpart. This took me two days of work, but I have used yahoo stats, espn stats, rivals.com, and athlon yearbook to make sure everyone's stuff is accurate. I feel like this roster is by far the most realistic that you can find. Thanks to everyone at operation sports that named these players. If you want the most accurate roster out, my xbox gamertag is RAGZY2112 and the filename is FINALROSTER in my locker. Please spread the word and feel free to share this with everyone so that we can all enjoy a REALISTIC simulation of the greatest game on earth.

[jkra0512]

I restarted my dynasty (only about 6 games in) with these rosters and then simmed to the game I am at until I had the same record. With my old dynasty all Big East teams had at least 3 losses (excluding Gtown who had 2) losing decisively to lower tier teams. I found this to be ridiculous considering how it is IRL.

When I restarted it, through the same number of games most teams had only one loss before Conference games and I feel that is a bit more realistic. I hear both sides of the discussion here, but I think Jason has a valid point to bring down some of these mid- and lower-tier teams who have guys who are completely overrated.

Not sure how this will effect the game come Season 2, but at least we can have one good season of a "normal" amount of upsets.

[Jason2112]

I am shooting for the most accurate simulation results. I just think this is a very good game and it's worth the time to get these ratings exact. The gameplay is awesome. If we can get the simulation engine to recreate believable results, we will have a GREAT game on our hands here.

[gamer2600]

Are these for Xbox or PS3...I would like to take a look as well if they are for PS3