Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

Anyone have any info on this? Last year the defence tackling stats were ridiculous. CB's and S' hardly got any tackles and LB's had way too many. Is it fixed?

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

I really hope so! They can have all the amazing presentation that they want, but if the the stat engine sucks, the game won't be all that great.

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

So true

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

yea, really i hated when chris clairborne (Vikes LB) always led the league with like 175 tackles

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

At 4 mins it wasn't that bad.

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

Well to be honest for guys to have like 191 or even 200 TOTAL isn't bad. IT just needs to be the right guys and FEW guys getting it.

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
LBzrule said:
Well to be honest for guys to have like 191 or even 200 TOTAL isn't bad. IT just needs to be the right guys and FEW guys getting it.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

that true, also playing on 4 minutes would mess other things up like WR stats...not a lot of WR got good stats...the RBs hogged all the stats.

SEGA/VC whoever...needs to work on the sim/stat engine!!! MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR PArt of the game...

Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats?
 

Also, what about fieldgoals? Does the computer actually miss sometimes now? I agree the graphics are off the chain, but it's the small stuff that can effect replay value.