More Links

ryestye · 06-07-2004, 12:47 PM

Anyone have any info on this? Last year the defence tackling stats were ridiculous. CB's and S' hardly got any tackles and LB's had way too many. Is it fixed?

Blatherton · 06-07-2004, 03:33 PM

I really hope so! They can have all the amazing presentation that they want, but if the the stat engine sucks, the game won't be all that great.

roadpimp · 06-07-2004, 05:56 PM

So true

HbK265 · 06-07-2004, 08:21 PM

yea, really i hated when chris clairborne (Vikes LB) always led the league with like 175 tackles

BigTigLSU · 06-07-2004, 08:22 PM

At 4 mins it wasn't that bad.

LBzrule · 06-07-2004, 08:40 PM

Well to be honest for guys to have like 191 or even 200 TOTAL isn't bad. IT just needs to be the right guys and FEW guys getting it.

Darth_Vader · 06-07-2004, 09:38 PM

Quote:

LBzrule said:
Well to be honest for guys to have like 191 or even 200 TOTAL isn't bad. IT just needs to be the right guys and FEW guys getting it.

that true, also playing on 4 minutes would mess other things up like WR stats...not a lot of WR got good stats...the RBs hogged all the stats.

SEGA/VC whoever...needs to work on the sim/stat engine!!! MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR PArt of the game...

ryestye · 06-09-2004, 03:03 PM

Also, what about fieldgoals? Does the computer actually miss sometimes now? I agree the graphics are off the chain, but it's the small stuff that can effect replay value.

06-07-2004, 12:47 PM	#1
ryestye Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Aug 2002	Have they fixed the simulation stats? Anyone have any info on this? Last year the defence tackling stats were ridiculous. CB's and S' hardly got any tackles and LB's had way too many. Is it fixed?

06-07-2004, 03:33 PM	#2
Blatherton Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Jun 2004	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? I really hope so! They can have all the amazing presentation that they want, but if the the stat engine sucks, the game won't be all that great.

06-07-2004, 05:56 PM	#3
roadpimp Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Jun 2003	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? So true

06-07-2004, 08:21 PM	#4
HbK265 Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Feb 2004	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? yea, really i hated when chris clairborne (Vikes LB) always led the league with like 175 tackles

06-07-2004, 08:22 PM	#5
BigTigLSU Hp Hp 4 Hrsmn OVR: 34* Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Death Valley aka Baton Rouge Posts: 6,506 Blog Entries: 2	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? At 4 mins it wasn't that bad.

	MLB The Show 24 Review: Another Solid Hit for the Series
	New Star GP Review: Old-School Arcade Fun
	Where Are Our College Basketball Video Game Rumors?

06-07-2004, 08:40 PM	#6
LBzrule Hall Of Fame OVR: 40 Join Date: Jul 2002 Blog Entries: 8	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? Well to be honest for guys to have like 191 or even 200 TOTAL isn't bad. IT just needs to be the right guys and FEW guys getting it.

06-07-2004, 09:38 PM	#7
Darth_Vader Rookie OVR: 3 Join Date: Apr 2003	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? Quote: *LBzrule said:* Well to be honest for guys to have like 191 or even 200 TOTAL isn't bad. IT just needs to be the right guys and FEW guys getting it. that true, also playing on 4 minutes would mess other things up like WR stats...not a lot of WR got good stats...the RBs hogged all the stats. SEGA/VC whoever...needs to work on the sim/stat engine!!! MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR PArt of the game...

06-09-2004, 03:03 PM	#8
ryestye Rookie OVR: 1 Join Date: Aug 2002	Re: Have they fixed the simulation stats? Also, what about fieldgoals? Does the computer actually miss sometimes now? I agree the graphics are off the chain, but it's the small stuff that can effect replay value.

More Links

Have they fixed the simulation stats?