[bkrich83]

Quote: Originally Posted by Scottdau

Moss is all I have to say. Also, if they have played the Broncos they would have beat the Falcons. The Vikings had the better O line and how can you say they had the better RB. Smith was pretty damn good too. We were more explosive. The way the Broncos would have won the game was to keep the ball as long as they can. We could strike at any minute and having Moss would be the difference.

I have no idea how you come up with the Vikes had the better oline, when many feel that Denver line was amongst the greatest ever. As I said, Denver was better at every position on offense, sans WR, and they had a pair of pro bowlers at WR in their own right.

But I guess the main difference between the two teams is Denver lived up to the hype while Minnesota didn't.