[Ckhoss29]

Quote: Originally Posted by SoxFan01605

I suppose it's a matter of perspective. The swing stick gives you more control of timing ONLY. The control of the hip rotation you speak of is just another aspect of swing timing. So yes, in that regard, it offers more precise control when done well...which it hasn't been thus far. Where it falls short, is that it completely ignores bat placement through the zone. In reality, you can time the ball perfectly, but if you swing at shoulder level when the pitch is at the knees, let's see where that takes you. A zone or cursor hitting system allows for this type of precise control. You end up with much better hit variety (when correctly implemented, of course) and really have more control of the whole process. You can get the "sawed off" singles, opposite field bloops, "cue shots," etc, etc. So it really comes down to what's more important to you. Do you want more precision timing control? (and I'll even grant the possiblilty of power generation...though as 2K's system is currently constituted, it has basically zero effect in that regard) If so, then "swing stick" makes a lot of sense. If you want more control over how you aim your swing and better hit variety, then I think a zone or cursor system is a better option. Personally, I'll always take option two. I have no problem if swing stick is an option, but I'd almost assuredly never use it.

I personally enjoy the swing stick more. Yes it is more about timing than anything, but it feels like I actually accomplish a little more swinging that way alot more than either the pure timing button press (mvp) or the cursor hitting system.