Operation Sports Forums - View Single Post

RogueHominid · 05-31-2010, 11:41 AM

I really don't like the idea of having coach contract lengths, expectations, and firings.

We weren't even able to get 32 teams to meet the very minimal demands of a cap sheet (take a look at what a mess some of them are still) or the draft. There's no way we could get folks to keep up with and be on board with *another* off-season/extra-curricular task/requirement.

I also just don't like the idea of getting fired as an owner; it doesn't sound fun. I get that it's "realistic" in some sense (though some of the winningest teams are known for not firing coaches, like PIT and IND), but the league is already hyper-competitive and I'm not sure we need to do anything more to juice that up. I have all the competitiveness I need in my gaming life just trying to get a win in this league.

Just my .02.

05-31-2010, 11:41 AM	#30
RogueHominid Hall Of Fame OVR: 33 Join Date: Aug 2006 Posts: 10,722	Re: ACQB Transition Itinerary I really don't like the idea of having coach contract lengths, expectations, and firings. We weren't even able to get 32 teams to meet the very minimal demands of a cap sheet (take a look at what a mess some of them are still) or the draft. There's no way we could get folks to keep up with and be on board with another off-season/extra-curricular task/requirement. I also just don't like the idea of getting fired as an owner; it doesn't sound fun. I get that it's "realistic" in some sense (though some of the winningest teams are known for not firing coaches, like PIT and IND), but the league is already hyper-competitive and I'm not sure we need to do anything more to juice that up. I have all the competitiveness I need in my gaming life just trying to get a win in this league. Just my .02.