In the final week of the season, the voting looked like this
King(my guy)
Williams
Miller
All had yellow bars, all 3 are Wideouts. Williams leads the league in yards, up by 50 on me, I lead him in literally every other category.
Miller leads the league in absolutely nothing, and is ELEVENTH in yards. ELEVENTH.
Williams and I had games, he had 2 receptions for like 70 yards and no TDs. I got king 120 yards and 2 TDs.
And MILLER, who didn't even have a game, so did nothing, and who is ELEVENTH in yards, and doesn't lead the league in anything, he's behind King and Williams in everything, WINS the damn Heisman. BY OVER 100 VOTES OVER KING, NO LESS.
Couldn't be him being on a better team, I have the best team out of the 3, I'm ranked 2, Texas (Williams) is ranked like 5th, and Oklahoma (Miller) is 6th.
King wins the trophy for best WR, as he should. I could see Williams winning the Heisman (although I'd be a bit perplexed as I should've won it with ease), but how in the WORLD does Miller walk away with it?


Comment