Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • srudoff
    Banned
    • Mar 2004
    • 680

    #1

    Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

    The #1 overall recruit, Samuel Pierre, Athlete from Garfield Hts, OH, had me #1 early on. After a few weeks and using my spreadsheet for tracking recruiting, I noticed that even though I spent only 10 minutes on him a few weeks, my lead kept increasing. Eventually he signed with with relative ease. I get to the offseason where I can change his position and it says that he's an 84 at...... fullback -and nothing over 79 at any other position. I guess now I know why no one else was going after him. Funny thing is that when I was looking at his ratings, I couldn't figure out for the life of me where he'd end up. Most times it's very easy to see if a guy is a DB WR or QB.

    Oh well, the world needs fullbacks too I guess.
  • brentech
    Rookie
    • Apr 2010
    • 44

    #2
    Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

    That's funny cause with my least season I had recruited an athlete that I thought for sure was a fullback. He had B range break tackle and pass/run blocking, but then also had some throw power.

    Turned out he was a QB. I was really bummed because I needed a young FB to groom.

    Comment

    • QuinnMahoney
      Rookie
      • Aug 2009
      • 169

      #3
      Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

      There are two athletes in the top five of my current recruiting class, I think both of them will be fullbacks. They look like they are ok at every position, but are lacking a certain skill to make them great at it. They have good coverage, but bad speed. They have good block shedding, but bad tackling. I thought EA said they don't make 5 star fullbacks anymore....
      Oklahoma City Thunder
      Buffalo Bills
      Baltimore Orioles

      Comment

      • brentech
        Rookie
        • Apr 2010
        • 44

        #4
        Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

        Originally posted by QuinnMahoney
        There are two athletes in the top five of my current recruiting class, I think both of them will be fullbacks. They look like they are ok at every position, but are lacking a certain skill to make them great at it. They have good coverage, but bad speed. They have good block shedding, but bad tackling. I thought EA said they don't make 5 star fullbacks anymore....
        I think they just said they were drastically lowering the chance that a FB would be a top 150 recruit.

        Comment

        • FedExPope
          Pro
          • Aug 2009
          • 900

          #5
          Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

          I love talented young FBs. The game seems to hate the position, most teams get 1 and half the time they're a senior. I hate recruiting them...as well as kickers and punters.

          Comment

          • Ricky Rowe Zay
            Rookie
            • Aug 2010
            • 448

            #6
            Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

            Originally posted by srudoff
            The #1 overall recruit, Samuel Pierre, Athlete from Garfield Hts, OH, had me #1 early on. After a few weeks and using my spreadsheet for tracking recruiting, I noticed that even though I spent only 10 minutes on him a few weeks, my lead kept increasing. Eventually he signed with with relative ease. I get to the offseason where I can change his position and it says that he's an 84 at...... fullback -and nothing over 79 at any other position. I guess now I know why no one else was going after him. Funny thing is that when I was looking at his ratings, I couldn't figure out for the life of me where he'd end up. Most times it's very easy to see if a guy is a DB WR or QB.

            Oh well, the world needs fullbacks too I guess.
            You think thats bad. I had Rutgers and recruited the #1 WR in the country in my 1st year, he was from NJ and I had to battle to get on his list even promising him early playing time.

            He came in at 74.

            Comment

            • georgiafan
              Hall Of Fame
              • Jul 2002
              • 11048

              #7
              Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

              Originally posted by FedExPope
              I love talented young FBs. The game seems to hate the position, most teams get 1 and half the time they're a senior. I hate recruiting them...as well as kickers and punters.
              I hear you on FB's man I had to sign 2 TE's and convert them to FB and then had to move another player over from TE to FB to start for a year.
              Retro Redemption - Starting over with a oldschool PowerBone Offense

              My Youtube

              Twitter

              PS5 ID = BubbasCruise

              Comment

              • picktown33
                Rookie
                • Jul 2009
                • 9

                #8
                Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

                I just found out that the 1-star fullback i signed (with a 2-star team) is a 73 ovr! I was surprised to say the least.

                Comment

                • bmxdmx
                  Rookie
                  • Nov 2007
                  • 175

                  #9
                  Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

                  Originally posted by picktown33
                  I just found out that the 1-star fullback i signed (with a 2-star team) is a 73 ovr! I was surprised to say the least.

                  Fullbacks hate my school eventhough at my school they get ample playing time. The carries might not be there but at least they're on the field. Hell my FB got 3 Rec Tds off of playactions.

                  Comment

                  • georgiafan
                    Hall Of Fame
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 11048

                    #10
                    Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

                    Originally posted by picktown33
                    I just found out that the 1-star fullback i signed (with a 2-star team) is a 73 ovr! I was surprised to say the least.
                    FB have good ratings they just are not 4 and 5 * like other positions.
                    Retro Redemption - Starting over with a oldschool PowerBone Offense

                    My Youtube

                    Twitter

                    PS5 ID = BubbasCruise

                    Comment

                    • hazey
                      Pro
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 723

                      #11
                      Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

                      Where are these "spreadsheets" you are speaking of?

                      Comment

                      • zukes
                        Pro
                        • Mar 2005
                        • 703

                        #12
                        Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

                        I may be blind, or maybe it's a pay option, but where do you see the ratings for recruits. I am on my 3rd season, and hadn't played NCAA since last gen, so this is the first year I have seen this type of recruiting. Got so sick of Madden so bought this game and haven't regretted it.

                        Comment

                        • oldman
                          MVP
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 1568

                          #13
                          Re: Why wasn't anyone recruiting the #1 overall recruit..

                          As Arkansas I throw the ball to the TE a ton. In fact 3 of my 4 seasons the TE has been my leading reciever. Needless to say I have TE's falling over themselves to come play for me, so that is how I have had to fill the FB position. I usually have 4-5 TE's on my team and convert at least one to FB when I need one. I have pretty much quit recruiting any FB's, besides maybe the #1 or 2 ranked one if they are interested in me, and have just started spending my time elsewhere.
                          DSM Transfer.

                          WOO PIG SOOIEE!

                          Comment

                          Working...