[Fiddy]

Quote: Originally Posted by RealmK

I dunno Fids, aside from 2k10's arenas looking more distinct that's pretty much where it ends for me with that game, their player models are laughable imo, and the game without having a user make a million edits, isn't fun and isn't hockey. I've droned on and on about the AI in that game, I won't do it here but it's even worse than EA's. Not entirely sure what you mean by better presentation, the NHL Today interface is neat and all but 2k10, and really 2k hockey on the whole since about 2k6 on leaves me with one word to sum up the whole experience. Clunky.

i dunno what game you played, 2k10 on ps3? maybe thats why.. but team strats work, players play hockey unlike in EA's game. thats why i mentioned about EA getting the strats to work properly. without making player rating edits, just adjusting strats.

is it perfect on 2k10? heck no, far from it.. but it better represents the game of hockey than what we have seen with the NHL series.

player models, agree, rough looking, but 100% better player faces and its not even close. ill take EA's models, but the amount of faces they dont have that 2k10 does is inexcusable IMO. esp for vets.

arenas, enough said. the ice, enough said.

stat overlays presentation wise so much better, again IMO..

its sad that ea dont hire some of the old 2k hockey team and try and come up with the best of both worlds for us hockey fans. bc if they did that, we would have some happy hockey gamers..

(again, not turning into a debate, just frustrating). we need 2 hockey games to choice from!!

then maybe i could retire 2k8, 2k10 and never have to go back.