[Kaanyr Vhok]

Quote: Originally Posted by remdizzle

I noticed this too bro, 2k's shooting mechanics and probabilities for next-gen are all out of whack in so many ways lol. Of course we all experience the A+, Excellent shot feedback bricks, and the opposite random swishes lol. I'm curious to see your video as I noticed this in particular with next-gen since I played on current-gen (PC) for a good 3 months; At first glance most think that ratings work like grades; 60's = D , 70's = C , 80's = B , 90's = A ; whereas in reality anything above 65 (from my observation and testing) suffices as a good enough rating to show success in whichever category aside from things such as on ball D and stealing probability.

Exactly. IMO it translated better in CG. In NG Matthews is underrated statistically with a 67 med but he shoots as good as Aldridge does in real life while Aldridge who has an 88 shoots better than anyone who ever played the game. Then you have Garnett with a 92.