Operation Sports Forums - View Single Post - NCAA 14

32jack · 07-12-2014, 10:24 AM

**new twist to gameplay... at least for me... used matt's newest set. took average slider number between user and cpu and decided to play as both teams.

**used matt's newest penalty set and have team aggression at 50-50.

**took ched's idea about changing defensive play to aggressive for stripping the ball, so as to force some fumbles.
**played coach mode for both tex a+m and missouri. set both defenses to play aggressive regarding stripping of ball. in coach mode i am on the sidelines with a tv view.

**for defense i took (without looking) middle play suggestion and then called the offensive play based on down and yardage.

**highlights i observed---
+mizzou wr's fumbled 2x on big hits.
+3 big hits resulting in pass incompletions.
+fumble on mizzou kickoff.
+fumble on mizzou run.
+saw offensive pass interference call.
+saw a pass deflection by tamu end.
+saw at least 3 great read options by manziel.
+manziel was driving the aggies to a clinching td late in the game and fumbled it back to mizzou in the red zone.

PLAYED IN AA- AA USER MODE.

Here are the real life stats for the game.

a+m 70 plays- 379/ 5.4 ave
mizz 74- 463/ 6.3

a+m 5.3 ave. running the ball
mizz 5.1

a+m 69% passing/ 5.6 ypc
mizzou 63%/ 7.9

REPLAY STATS--
A+M- 38
MIZZOU- 35

A+M 79 PLAYS- 466 YDS/ 5.9
MIZZ 73- 420/ 5.8

A+M 45 RUNS- 246 YDS/ 5.5
MIZZ 32- 133/ 4.2

A+M 22-34/ 220 YDS/ 64%/ 2 SACKS/ 4 DROPS/ 10 YPC
MIZZ 28-41/ 287/ 68%/ 5 SACKS/ 2 DROPS/ 10 YPC

A+M 38% 3RD DOWN
MIZZ 38%

A+M 2 TURNOVERS
MIZZ 3 TURNOVERS

My thoughts-- Playing this way, I felt as if the playing field was leveled. I've read where playing at AA-AA level, ratings truly matter. I was very involved in the game and it was great fun being the play caller for both offenses. Playing against the CPU, and trying to get a realistic simulation in terms of accurate stats-- especially that darn passing game has been challenging, no doubt. This game, although a small sample, was about as good a game as I've played on NCAA.
Looking at the above numbers... I'm fairly certain that the 11.01 set is quite compatible with my way of playing!

07-12-2014, 10:24 AM	#4483
32jack Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Sep 2012	Re: NCAA 14 - OS Community + Playmakers Split Sliders new twist to gameplay... at least for me... used matt's newest set. took average slider number between user and cpu and decided to play as both teams. used matt's newest penalty set and have team aggression at 50-50. took ched's idea about changing defensive play to aggressive for stripping the ball, so as to force some fumbles. played coach mode for both tex a+m and missouri. set both defenses to play aggressive regarding stripping of ball. in coach mode i am on the sidelines with a tv view. for defense i took (without looking) middle play suggestion and then called the offensive play based on down and yardage. highlights i observed--- +mizzou wr's fumbled 2x on big hits. +3 big hits resulting in pass incompletions. +fumble on mizzou kickoff. +fumble on mizzou run. +saw offensive pass interference call. +saw a pass deflection by tamu end. +saw at least 3 great read options by manziel. +manziel was driving the aggies to a clinching td late in the game and fumbled it back to mizzou in the red zone. PLAYED IN AA- AA USER MODE. Here are the real life stats for the game. a+m 70 plays- 379/ 5.4 ave mizz 74- 463/ 6.3 a+m 5.3 ave. running the ball mizz 5.1 a+m 69% passing/ 5.6 ypc mizzou 63%/ 7.9 REPLAY STATS-- A+M- 38 MIZZOU- 35 A+M 79 PLAYS- 466 YDS/ 5.9 MIZZ 73- 420/ 5.8 A+M 45 RUNS- 246 YDS/ 5.5 MIZZ 32- 133/ 4.2 A+M 22-34/ 220 YDS/ 64%/ 2 SACKS/ 4 DROPS/ 10 YPC MIZZ 28-41/ 287/ 68%/ 5 SACKS/ 2 DROPS/ 10 YPC A+M 38% 3RD DOWN MIZZ 38% A+M 2 TURNOVERS MIZZ 3 TURNOVERS My thoughts-- Playing this way, I felt as if the playing field was leveled. I've read where playing at AA-AA level, ratings truly matter. I was very involved in the game and it was great fun being the play caller for both offenses. Playing against the CPU, and trying to get a realistic simulation in terms of accurate stats-- especially that darn passing game has been challenging, no doubt. This game, although a small sample, was about as good a game as I've played on NCAA. Looking at the above numbers... I'm fairly certain that the 11.01 set is quite compatible with my way of playing!