Operation Sports Forums - View Single Post - GroundNPound All Pro + Slow/Very Slow CFM Sliders

GroundNPound · 09-30-2014, 01:34 AM

OK I have posted below the first 7 Box Scores with these sliders (I played as Bills and Raiders). Here are scores and opposing QB Stats. See Boxscores below for more detail.

Bills Beat Dolphins 28-24: Tannehill 22-29-204-79%-0-1 Sacked 5 times
Dolphins Beat Bills 24-16: Tannehill 14-21-199-66%-1-0 Sacked 3 times
Raiders Beat Bucs 34-7: Glennon 21-32-203-66%1-2 Sacked 3 Times
Colts Beat Raiders 31-24: Luck 18-31-357-58%-2-0 Sacked 4 times
Raiders beat Jags 31-10: R Wlson 09-18-126-50%-0-0 Sacked 6 Times
Raiders beat SD 17-10: Rivers 22-34-240-64%-1-0 Sacked 6 Times
Chiefs Beat Raiders 20-17 C Daniel 22-28-225-78%-1-0 Sacked 3 Times

Through 7 Games:

Average Pass Yds against: 222
Average Pass Pct Against:66%
Ave # of Sacks: 4.28

Sacks are still too high to satisfy purists but IMHO represent a serious improvement. Keep in mind I am rolling with a 46 defense and would expect more sacks than average. I would be curious if someone tried these using a more conservative Cover 2 DEF.

09-30-2014, 01:34 AM	#3
GroundNPound Rookie OVR: 0 Join Date: Sep 2013	Re: GroundNPound All Pro + Slow/Very Slow CFM Sliders OK I have posted below the first 7 Box Scores with these sliders (I played as Bills and Raiders). Here are scores and opposing QB Stats. See Boxscores below for more detail. Bills Beat Dolphins 28-24: Tannehill 22-29-204-79%-0-1 Sacked 5 times Dolphins Beat Bills 24-16: Tannehill 14-21-199-66%-1-0 Sacked 3 times Raiders Beat Bucs 34-7: Glennon 21-32-203-66%1-2 Sacked 3 Times Colts Beat Raiders 31-24: Luck 18-31-357-58%-2-0 Sacked 4 times Raiders beat Jags 31-10: R Wlson 09-18-126-50%-0-0 Sacked 6 Times Raiders beat SD 17-10: Rivers 22-34-240-64%-1-0 Sacked 6 Times Chiefs Beat Raiders 20-17 C Daniel 22-28-225-78%-1-0 Sacked 3 Times Through 7 Games: Average Pass Yds against: 222 Average Pass Pct Against:66% Ave # of Sacks: 4.28 Sacks are still too high to satisfy purists but IMHO represent a serious improvement. Keep in mind I am rolling with a 46 defense and would expect more sacks than average. I would be curious if someone tried these using a more conservative Cover 2 DEF. Last edited by GroundNPound; 09-30-2014 at 02:07 PM.