Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
Bro i thought it was poetic shhh lmaoComment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
That cant seriously be your point. Yes I am only one person but Id be guarding the other teams best offensive player. And I also have another buddy with a similar build. As far as the rest of the team, we meed some sort of playmaker, some sort of sharpshooter. And the last could be a wildcard. Its a team game so why in the hell are you bringing up the point that im only one person. LOL smh. If we negate your best offensive players. Do I have to explain how that is an advantage? Look dont play 2k if you dont really understand basketball. Honestly.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
Disagree because to me that's rather simplistic - dismissive and close minded - but then again you've seemed rather vicious against lockdown defenders in almost any post you mention them. Jesus mate give em a break lmao. I think it's better to wait and see before jumping into the negative side of things. You seem quite confident that they will be incompetent. I rather hope they work great so there's balance.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
With all that said, I score in situational moments, like an offensive board or a steal and a fastbreak. In transition and also by cutting to the basket at opportune moments. See the learning curve is just higher for a lockdown defender cause you have to actually know how to play basketball.
Look there is no best build, play what you have fun with but dont sit here and say a particular build will be the Worst, thats an exagerration. You're simpleminded. No offense.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
*Facepalm* For the love of...it's like people are choosing not to read.
Even if you take away the team's best offensive player, there's still 4 other players on the floor. Those same individuals you are bringing up were also surrounded by other great defensive players. Ben Wallace, Rodman, etc.
Like someone mentioned, you have to have basketball knowledge AND 2K knowledge to succeed. Let's say you take away their Sharpshooter. That still leaves their Slasher and/or Shot Creator on the perimeter, and whatever offensive player at the 4 and/or 5. Unless your team is filled with Lockdown Defenders and Glass Eaters, there's a good chance the Sharpshooters/Slshers/Shot Creators/Post Scorers/Playmakers on your team are going to get toasted, because their subpar defensive rating has to consistently stop the opposing players with the same archetype.
And as far as 2k's shooting balance (as someone mentioned): Lockdown Defenders were forced to give up their offensive stats due to 'balance', so no, you're not going to be effective offensively with just 7 upgrades. People will just back off you and wait near the paint, daring you to shoot.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
So they double your playmaker and play up on your sharpshooter, who can't hit nearly as well once he moves and has no playmaking to speak of. They have 2 guys they barely even have to guard unless they are in the paint. They won't be good for anything but setting picks and hoping to get an offensive board here and there.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
You can preach till you're blue in the face, but just because YOU will have a defensive player and can stop whoever YOU are guarding doesn't mean the Sharpshooter on your team will be able to stop his matchup. Same goes with the Slasher/Playmaker/Shot Creator/etc. A good team will instantly recognize the scorers on your team and will attack them relentlessly with their own offensive players. Why? Because they'll know their defensive ratings are subpar.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
*Facepalm* For the love of...it's like people are choosing not to read.
Even if you take away the team's best offensive player, there's still 4 other players on the floor. Those same individuals you are bringing up were also surrounded by other great defensive players. Ben Wallace, Rodman, etc.
Like someone mentioned, you have to have basketball knowledge AND 2K knowledge to succeed. Let's say you take away their Sharpshooter. That still leaves their Slasher and/or Shot Creator on the perimeter, and whatever offensive player at the 4 and/or 5. Unless your team is filled with Lockdown Defenders and Glass Eaters, there's a good chance the Sharpshooters/Slshers/Shot Creators/Post Scorers/Playmakers on your team are going to get toasted, because their subpar defensive rating has to consistently stop the opposing players with the same archetype.
And as far as 2k's shooting balance (as someone mentioned): Lockdown Defenders were forced to give up their offensive stats due to 'balance', so no, you're not going to be effective offensively with just 7 upgrades. People will just back off you and wait near the paint, daring you to shoot.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
*Facepalm* For the love of...it's like people are choosing not to read.
Even if you take away the team's best offensive player, there's still 4 other players on the floor. Those same individuals you are bringing up were also surrounded by other great defensive players. Ben Wallace, Rodman, etc.
Like someone mentioned, you have to have basketball knowledge AND 2K knowledge to succeed. Let's say you take away their Sharpshooter. That still leaves their Slasher and/or Shot Creator on the perimeter, and whatever offensive player at the 4 and/or 5. Unless your team is filled with Lockdown Defenders and Glass Eaters, there's a good chance the Sharpshooters/Slshers/Shot Creators/Post Scorers/Playmakers on your team are going to get toasted, because their subpar defensive rating has to consistently stop the opposing players with the same archetype.
And as far as 2k's shooting balance (as someone mentioned): Lockdown Defenders were forced to give up their offensive stats due to 'balance', so no, you're not going to be effective offensively with just 7 upgrades. People will just back off you and wait near the paint, daring you to shoot.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
This a message simple minded non basketball IQ having peeps. COME HARDER. I will say my corny line, Teach me something. If you make a good point ill say thank you but the arguments your talking about now are like strawman arguments, they hold no Weight. You cant actually be serious when I bring up Hall of Famers with this same kind of build and you thin after 17 years of 2k the Dev team is not smart enough finally let us build our own Dennia Rodmans and Ben Wallaces. To deny the effectivness of the build means you DONT WANT 2k to be simulated and balanced. Jordan would not have 6 rings without Dennis Rodman and Ben Wallace and the Pistons would not have beat Gary Paton, Kobe, Shaq and Karl Malone for a championship if it wasnt for this kind of build. To deny the effectiveness of it is means you dont want 2k to be the most realistic basketball game on the planet. Well guess what your wrong, the Devs are not that stupid.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
I for one think it's very easy to create scenarios of someone not being effective - or less effective - before actually playing. I think that's pretty much the point made. Things like focusing on one teams possible weaknesses but forgetting the other team is not perfect either. Rarely does everything go as precisely planned beforehand. Are you referencing me on the shooting balance thing? cause i was talking about defensive balance not shooting. Just incase. Might wanna mention who you responded to there lol. Just so there's no confusion.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
I'm talking both. The point of 2k this year is simple: You're going to give up either offense or defense. Give and take. If you want an offensive player, you're gonna have to give up defense. If you want a defensive player, you have to give up offense. You don't have to 'play' in order to know that this is what they were striving for this year just by looking at the caps.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
I think there are pretty much a lot of assumptions being thrown around as supposed facts. We are all really assuming. Till the game drops we should stay open minded - positive - and hopeful for proper balance between builds. That means every build having the potential to be as dominant as the other. Not lockdown defender for example being easy to counter more easily than another. Defense can win games - if we are talking about a defender that is good in multiple aspects (not just providing lockdown of one player) then this could certainly be a very effective build that affects the team as a whole. With things like help defense - passing lane pressure - inside presence - fastbreak defense/chasedown blocks - fast recovery - charges. Defense is not as simplistic and unvaluable as some are making it seem. It's not all about 1v1. The best defenders know how to rotate propely and apply constant pressure. Eh - i feel like i keep repeating stuff. Might just forget about it.Comment
-
Re: Player Archetypes NBA 2k17
This a message simple minded non basketball IQ having peeps. COME HARDER. I will say my corny line, Teach me something. If you make a good point ill say thank you but the arguments your talking about now are like strawman arguments, they hold no Weight. You cant actually be serious when I bring up Hall of Famers with this same kind of build and you thin after 17 years of 2k the Dev team is not smart enough finally let us build our own Dennia Rodmans and Ben Wallaces. To deny the effectivness of the build means you DONT WANT 2k to be simulated and balanced. Jordan would not have 6 rings without Dennis Rodman and Ben Wallace and the Pistons would not have beat Gary Paton, Kobe, Shaq and Karl Malone for a championship if it wasnt for this kind of build. To deny the effectiveness of it is means you dont want 2k to be the most realistic basketball game on the planet. Well guess what your wrong, the Devs are not that stupid.
And if you're a LDD Power Forward, you're not going to be on the perimeter at all. And if you DO switch out there, then one of the perimeter players will have to guard the opposing PF, which means that PF is about to eat.Comment
Comment