I don't agree; he states he hasn't/won't even watch it...that could have been his response. Instead, he took the opportunity to state why he doesn't view it as a real documentary and how it's taking journalism where it shouldn't be going. It would be one thing if we all were in the dark about how this was made, but going in you KNOW who is behind it. It's been public knowledge; I go into it with open eyes. The high horse I see him on is the critiquing a documentary he hasn't watched because he thinks it tells history wrong...and he's been guilty of that himself on more than one occasion.
EDIT - BTW, I do think that criticism would be valid if this was a documentary about a serious topic...the JFK assassination, the civil rights movement, etc. We are talking about a basketball player/team.