2009 once again proves that exclusives hurt the consumer. 360 users were stuck with no baseball game. Meanwhile, wouldn't we all like to know what 2K College Football or NFL 2K would look like. We have all seen how exclusives such as Halo and MLB 09 among others can help dictate which system someone chooses. So, there is undeniable value in titles that are exclusive to consoles.
Though, one must wonder is there such a tremendous value in owning the exclusive license for sports leagues such as the NFL,MLB, and NCAA. Furthermore, someone let me in on how Sony was able to make a MLB game? 2K is truly looking real silly in this whole ordeal as they blame MLB for there slumping numbers, they should be blaming themselves for a deal that allowed Sony to make a game at all. Now that we see how NCAA games are having a hard time expanding or growing at the level they once were it is very questionable to just how valuable it is to have an exclusive to a game that is one of your worst sellers. As for Madden, being that the NFL is most likely Americas favorite sport it is hard to ever see having the license to this game as anything but a plus. It seams to me that this trend may have should ended with the NFL. On the other hand, there will always be those of us that will continue to wonder what a 2K game would look like in 2010 because of what it looked like in 2004/2005 but let us remember that the customer does not come first in the video gaming industry.
Finally, the question is did the industry go to far with exclusives and let there greed and power hungry ways make them less profitable than they would have been by allowing competition to fuel better performance?
|