FIFA 17 OS Community Sliders

[Matt10]

Quote: Originally Posted by Rachel93

So you want normal set 2 with just alterations to acceleration trying? I could test that. I don't know how to stream on Twitch though Have you decided anything on sprint speed yet?

Yeah, that sounds good. Run frequency was looking good this morning on 10 as well. Needs more testing though.

[Stimuli]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

The one in the spoiler is a burst, the one you have, Stim, looks much worse. Which settings?

Set 2 with

Marking 52/52
FT Control 55/55
Pass Error 57/57
Shot speed 49/49

[jesmith29]

Quote: Originally Posted by Bure10Beezer34

Check out my posts from the last few days. I play/tested BAP, player lock on CAM. Can respond more later if you still have questions. Hard to type on tablet lol.

What camera do you use for cam lock?

What difference does game speed (slow, normal) make?

[1860fan]

Please please Matt Like play you Acc at the time..?

[villabraves]

Quote: Originally Posted by Matt10

Btw, is anyone still testing out the Test #2 on Set #2? I've gotten mixed reviews on the 47/49 accel. While it's a great disparity for a challenge, it does feel like the CPU will attack you with their dribbling regardless. Has anyone tried 48/50 or 46/48? I do think the 2-pt discrepancy works, but not without its compromises of fatigue, CPU being too clinical, etc.

Matt, I put some screen shots up a few pages back of set 2 test 2 with acc 47/49. Both games ended 4-3 with me winning one and losing one. They were quite 'interesting' games. I put a brief description there too. I'm at work now but I did try 48/49 in my last game which seemed and felt better to me personally. That game ended with a 1-0 win for me but I accidentally deleted the screenshot!

[Velocityy]

I didn't really like 47/49 acceleration...I tried 47/48 (maybe it was 48/49), and while I thought the game played well, there were times where I felt I had no chance because of the discrepancy. It was more challenging in an artificial way.

I then played on 47/47 and liked it a lot. Didn't see any bursting. Saw less bad angles because of the slower ACC (by less, I mean 1 in a full 15 min halves game), and in general felt like the games were even in that regard.

[Matt10]

Quote: Originally Posted by Stimuli

Set 2 with Marking 52/52 FT Control 55/55 Pass Error 57/57 Shot speed 49/49

Thanks, Stim - odd one that.

Quote: Originally Posted by 1860fan

Please please Matt Like play you Acc at the time..?

I'm currently using 47/47, but will explore 47/48. My only concern is the CPU running at my players with no regard if they're going to lose it or not. Very strange.

Quote: Originally Posted by villabraves

Matt, I put some screen shots up a few pages back of set 2 test 2 with acc 47/49. Both games ended 4-3 with me winning one and losing one. They were quite 'interesting' games. I put a brief description there too. I'm at work now but I did try 48/49 in my last game which seemed and felt better to me personally. That game ended with a 1-0 win for me but I accidentally deleted the screenshot!

Oh great, I must've missed those. Thanks, Villa!

[Josam27o7]

Orion said the marking is too low at 52. Is there any update on our marking setting?

And Villabraves, there is still bad bursting on 48/49 -- so that doesn't work.