MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MacGowan
    Sassy
    • Jun 2017
    • 1681

    #1

    MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

    Originally posted by MartialMind
    Please. I want what you guys want, but we have to present it more intelligently and more specifically.

    So I posted a few of these in another thread about grappling, but I figured I'd flesh them out and put them up as its own thread, that way it won't drown in the noise.


    There are plenty of problems I have with the current grappling in this game, the transition denials that I've never seen anyone IRL use. The submission system that straight up looks like the blueprint of a space station, further exaggerates the problem of "fans just wanna stand N band".

    I think this picture says it all.

    As well as the animation that is so static compared to the fluid striking. I think it's fair that we can say the grappling could use some love.

    HOWEVER I'm not here to ask EA to revamp their grappling system. I'm here to add some suggestions I believe are PATCHABLE within reason, balanced, and that can really liven up the grappling for both the wrestling fans who want depth and tactical elements, as well as the stand and brawl types who would feel more comfortable with some simple and aesthetic changes.


    1: Allow you to follow a Knocked Down fighter to the ground

    There is definitely this awkward window where you knock a fighter down, and he either just bounces back to his feet on a spring board, or you flail around in the air unable to do much as you wait for him to get up. It feels like the game is hindering you from actually taking it to the ground. My suggestion is: depending on the timing you jump on him, you enter into different positions. turtle, back clinch, half guard. he's still rocked and you have the advantage to finish the fight.

    2: balancing the TakeDown/Clinch Denial window

    Not a lot to say about this one. People are complaining about the denial window on Clinch and TD. It's either too hard or too dangerous. I'm pretty confident in EA looking into this one for balancing purposes.

    3: Easier clinch entry

    Right now because of the control scheme and denial window getting into a clinch feels almost like you're doing the opposite of what you want to do. maybe you're getting lit up on your feet and you want to just grab 'em and ride out the storm. Instead you have to move the joystick AWAY from the fighter you want to move TOWARDS, hold in a different trigger than the one you use to defend your head with, and hold it there for a solid second. aaaaand you're knocked out....

    What you kinda want to happen is the opposite. Clinching is often used to neutralise inside boxing. It should be a very nice deterrent against super aggressive sluggers. but right now it isn't. When you fight a wrestler inside boxing is not something you'd wanna do if you're worried about grappling. Even to the point that I'd be ok with it AUTO CLINCHING if you get way too close to an opponent (wait! hear me out!)

    4: Single collar: Neutral, but deadly

    This brings me to the next point. Single Collar should be more faster and deadlier. You can get the single collar EASY, but now you have to watch your head, cuz that inside boxer can still knock it off with a clean uppercut or hook. So fear not! your friend can still be Mike Tyson! Mike Tyson was deadly in the clinch. he can easily break the clinch. thus creating a better balance where an inside boxer can STILL apply pressure if he knows how to punch you, get clinched (or clinch you), give you a few solid before one of you gets out. But you can also get the single collar and quickly move into over under.

    5: Light strikes in clinch not cancelling transitions

    So, if you like being a wrestler, you can transition fast enough, or with timing block and transition. Now we have some balance!

    6: Clinch movement sped up

    Also, while this is happening you are both moving around fluidly and fast. This can be both ways, so maybe you let him push you towards the cage before you circle around, and maybe one has the upper hand because of clinch stats. This is pretty important for a lot of reasons, but one is definitely for the casual viewer. The clinch would now look fun. The fighters could move fast in the clinch, and it would bridge the gap aesthetically (as well as functionally as i will get to) the clinch would LOOK and FEEL more like you're still actually fighting. And newbies wouldn't shy away from it so much.

    7: Movement on the ground

    Same with on the ground. One problem with the ground is you get the fight on the ground and you just sort of lie there in the middle of the octagon, waiting to deny a transition. Allow us to use the left joystick to move on the ground. With the top fighter having more of the power (depending on the position). Here's why:

    8: More benefits for grappling against the cage

    If there was a bonus (or more of a bonus) of putting your opponent against the cage there would be a real incentive in the clinch and ground to take it there. Perhaps his punches would deal far less damage for him while he's clinched against the cage, and his stamina would suffer. That way if you're getting lit up as Stipe, you have the option of quickly clinching Francis against the cage, getting your stamina back while you slowly drain his. Then when the time is right, you take him down. Of course for this we also would need:

    9: Seated Cage positions

    Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
    Why add something like a seated cage position which is one of the top requests I see often when comparing us to UD3?

    It wouldn't add to the function at all.
    I'm not sure, but I think when people ask for the seated cage position they do so believing the devs would add a significant bonus to the top player. So if you're Khabib and he's denying your transitions in the middle of the octagon in half guard, you can push him against the cage into a seated cage half guard, now he has even less stamina to work with, and your punches are deadlier. The revenge of the grinder.

    This all means you now have an added tactical depth to the clinch and ground game.

    10:Late TakeDown Denials resulting in double underhooks

    Been said a bunch of times here. I'd love it if late TDDs end up in double underhooks. Also with the added speed of clinch movement, a late denial could easily end up against the cage, where the pressuring wrestler would have the advantage.

    11: More blocks against striking.

    I wish I could block in Side Control and Half Guard. I understand that L2 and R2 are used to deny and submit, but It does feel weird to me. Allow us to block low and high in almost every position! That way a striker would feel more in control. The control scheme can be complex enough as it is, and it doesn't help when they change depending on the scenario

    12: More strikes in grappling, as well as a more coherent control scheme.

    Same with attack. If you're in turtle and I wanna uppercut you, it should be O△, If I wanna kick (knee) it should be X or O. If i wanna punch your body L2-▢ or L2-△. It should be reliable all the way through. Or as much as possible. Right now, in some positions, using L2-▢ won't do anything, and you don't know that before you try the position, and he transitions out while you sit there tapping buttons that now don't do anything. Linking this up would further merge the two worlds of striking and grappling. Now that a newbie striker can at least rely on the controls he already knows.

    In closing, I'll end with one that's a little off the beaten path.

    Bonus: Simple submissions cost stamina.

    I think if with settings: Simple submissions: On It might be great if they make pressing the X button cost a liiiiittle bit of stamina, that way it adds a depth of choosing to power out of a submission at the cost of your stamina, or choosing to lock in a submission at the danger of gassing out. Or if you play it safe you might feel the other person out: He's not mashing the X button, so you just mash a little faster than he is. Or maybe you got the 3rd-5th round stamina perks, so you just apply the submissions to make him work enough.


    All this would bring balanced depth to grappling, bridge the scary transition for newbies, while still making it fast and exciting.




    EDIT. ADDED ON APRIL 10TH
    13: Simple power out option

    Most beginners I've played with mash X when taken down or clinched. I wonder if they could add a control input from: "pressing X button quickly over three times is not strikes, but GET UP/BREAK attempt that builds up as you press it - costing larger amount of stamina, depending on the power ratings/grappling ratings."

    It could be linked to your stamina. Maybe it would be easier to deny. but it might be an easier transition for newbies. That might let them freak out, kick the wrestler off, if they've got the muscles, and burn themselves out doing so. instead now a newbie will just punch you once in the head on the ground before you move into top mount. where he will go "what the hell happened??"
    Last edited by MacGowan; 04-10-2018, 11:56 AM.
  • iceberg3445
    Rookie
    • Dec 2017
    • 431

    #2
    Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

    Thanks for posting this.

    Adding to your double underhooks idea (point 10), I would really like to see more advanced takedown defense outcomes in the future (I.e. more takedown to clinch animations and new standing grapple positions for takedowns defended late).

    This would make takedowns less binary and add that sense of struggle that everyone is taking about.


    Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

    Comment

    • iverson91
      Rookie
      • Oct 2012
      • 181

      #3
      Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

      Great job, I don't know how likealy any of this is to be patched in tho. Sadly we may have to wait for UFC 4 for this.
      PSN:BandOfGypsys91

      #simnation 2k player, add me if you play sim games.

      #Sixers

      Comment

      • MacGowan
        Sassy
        • Jun 2017
        • 1681

        #4
        Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

        Thank you!
        I don't know, as I've said before; it would be mind boggling to me if the patches keep focusing on balancing the striking. I believe they NEED to start focusing on the grappling. right now.

        Comment

        • iverson91
          Rookie
          • Oct 2012
          • 181

          #5
          Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

          Originally posted by MacGowan
          Thank you!
          I don't know, as I've said before; it would be mind boggling to me if the patches keep focusing on balancing the striking. I believe they NEED to start focusing on the grappling. right now.

          To me the devs have shown they couldn't care less about the grappling for this game. I really do think we will have to wait until UFC 4 for any grappling changes.
          PSN:BandOfGypsys91

          #simnation 2k player, add me if you play sim games.

          #Sixers

          Comment

          • Phillyboi207
            Banned
            • Apr 2012
            • 3159

            #6
            Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

            Originally posted by iverson91
            To me the devs have shown they couldn't care less about the grappling for this game. I really do think we will have to wait until UFC 4 for any grappling changes.
            Not true

            Devs listen to whatever the consensus wants

            If we want grappling changes we have to keep talking about it.

            Comment

            • Zeta Reticulan1
              Banned
              • Sep 2017
              • 471

              #7
              Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

              Originally posted by MacGowan

              3: Easier clinch entry

              Right now because of the control scheme and denial window getting into a clinch feels almost like you're doing the opposite of what you want to do. maybe you're getting lit up on your feet and you want to just grab 'em and ride out the storm. Instead you have to move the joystick AWAY from the fighter you want to move TOWARDS, hold in a different trigger than the one you use to defend your head with, and hold it there for a solid second. aaaaand you're knocked out....

              What you kinda want to happen is the opposite. Clinching is often used to neutralise inside boxing. It should be a very nice deterrent against super aggressive sluggers. but right now it isn't.
              Number 3 big time. It should be easier to use the clinch to neutralize inside boxing. The controls definitely don't help. It should be L1 + TOWARDS the opponent for single collar, not L2 + up.

              I really like all of the clinch ideas btw, but this one big time.

              Comment

              • MacGowan
                Sassy
                • Jun 2017
                • 1681

                #8
                Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                Originally posted by iverson91
                To me the devs have shown they couldn't care less about the grappling for this game. I really do think we will have to wait until UFC 4 for any grappling changes.
                Ah, I'm not sure why they would not care about grappling in the patches, and then care about the grappling for UFC4? If the patches continue to focus on striking balance I can imagine a UFC 4 with marginal improvements in grappling (enough to silence the hardcore mma fans) but a "brand new head movement engine we worked 2 years on".

                Originally posted by Phillyboi207
                Not true

                Devs listen to whatever the consensus wants

                If we want grappling changes we have to keep talking about it.

                That scares me though. You can't make a game through Twitter. A crowd can say what's wrong with a painting, but you can't ask them how to paint it.
                Last edited by MacGowan; 04-02-2018, 04:31 PM.

                Comment

                • AeroZeppelin27
                  MVP
                  • Nov 2017
                  • 2287

                  #9
                  Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                  Fantastic post! Really like these ideas!

                  Comment

                  • MacGowan
                    Sassy
                    • Jun 2017
                    • 1681

                    #10
                    Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                    Originally posted by AeroZeppelin27
                    Fantastic post! Really like these ideas!
                    Thanks

                    Originally posted by Zeta Reticulan1
                    Number 3 big time. It should be easier to use the clinch to neutralize inside boxing. The controls definitely don't help. It should be L1 + TOWARDS the opponent for single collar, not L2 + up.
                    Yeah, the window from inside boxing to clinching seems very wonky and slow.

                    Comment

                    • GameplayDevUFC
                      Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
                      • Jun 2014
                      • 2830

                      #11
                      Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                      I don't understand #3. Nothing clinch related requires you to push any stick away from your opponent.

                      Can you explain that one a bit more?

                      Comment

                      • Nugget7211
                        MVP
                        • Nov 2017
                        • 1401

                        #12
                        Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                        Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
                        I don't understand #3. Nothing clinch related requires you to push any stick away from your opponent.

                        Can you explain that one a bit more?
                        I mean, if the fighters are of equal height, you could argue that up is away?
                        **** off, Nugget7211 - GPD, 2017 & 2018
                        Internet Hero - Jack Slack, 2018

                        Comment

                        • Skynet
                          EA Sports UFC Developer
                          • Mar 2015
                          • 703

                          #13
                          Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                          I'd also like to point out what seems to be a little known fact:

                          If you deny a takedown attempt with L2+R2, you will go into double-unders. Totally a thing already, and most people don't know it (I myself totally forgot until a couple weeks ago!)

                          That animation could certainly be made into more of a late denial scenario, but just wanted people to know it actually is there

                          Awesome write-up, and very concise feedback!

                          Comment

                          • MacGowan
                            Sassy
                            • Jun 2017
                            • 1681

                            #14
                            Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                            Originally posted by GameplayDevUFC
                            I don't understand #3. Nothing clinch related requires you to push any stick away from your opponent.

                            Can you explain that one a bit more?
                            Sure!


                            Moving "North" when you are trying to move "East" makes it feel less intuitive.

                            Great intuitive control schemes are the ones that set up a helpful rule set so you don't have to remember everything. Example: you know the L2 is the body button, you know ▢ is a jab. Now you know L2+▢ is a body jab! You don't have to remember the 3 things, only 2! I wish those kind of control schemes/rules were used more in this game, say when you're on the ground, (as i've mentioned) sometimes they don't do that at all (example side control), but sometimes they do (top mount) causing a bit of confusion. or with the clinch

                            Originally posted by Skynet
                            If you deny a takedown attempt with L2+R2, you will go into double-unders. Totally a thing already, and most people don't know it (I myself totally forgot until a couple weeks ago!)

                            That animation could certainly be made into more of a late denial scenario, but just wanted people to know it actually is there

                            Awesome write-up, and very concise feedback!
                            Thank you, Skynet! and wow, I actually didn't know that! I'll try it out

                            Comment

                            • GameplayDevUFC
                              Former EA Sports UFC Gameplay Developer
                              • Jun 2014
                              • 2830

                              #15
                              Re: MacGowan's patchable grappling suggestions

                              OK, I see what you mean.

                              Problem is every grappling action is done towards your opponent, and we have to fit all of them into the control scheme somehow.

                              That's probably the only one on your list I'd say is completely off the table for patches.

                              Comment

                              Working...