The first two don't seem related to this thread, that is ensuring hitters match their pull/push tendencies without input from the user.
Does that third option really sound desireable to you? Imagine you're in a situation with a runner on third and a right handed pull hitter at the plate. You want some internal force to make it more difficult for you to go the other way and score the run "productively"?
That doesn't sound desirable to me at all. Keep in mind that there is no actual physical barrier stopping real life pull hitters from going the other way (or stopping push hitters from pulling). David Ortiz pulls all his pitches because he chooses to. Most of these guys are just too stubborn to change their approach, but it's only that: an approach. If someone decided tomorrow that they would no longer be a pull hitter, it's as simple as going to the cage and practicing a later swing, delaying your timing a bit, and getting it into muscle memory. Within a week, at the most, any pull hitter could become a balanced hitter, if they actually wanted to do that.
My preference is for no bias at all. But I recognize that that is not what the majority of players want. Either way though, the less overriding bias for human-controlled players, the better. I'd rather control my own destiny. That's why I'm playing the game and not just watching one.
Comment