MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

[kenp86]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

It's been 3 and a half hours. Regardless Reyes has negative value. He has a massive contract and he put his hands on a woman. I don't see any teams taking that on

like a day but nonetheless. Didn't see Colorado taking him either but they did. I agree has virtually untradable unless he's lighting it up.

How about CarGo? What's the. Best package I could possibly get for him?

[Bard]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

It's been 3 and a half hours. Regardless Reyes has negative value. He has a massive contract and he put his hands on a woman. I don't see any teams taking that on

Well I would if it was Reyes for Panda...but neither team needs the other.

Sent from my SM-G925V using Tapatalk

[AC]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

What kind of deal would it take you think? I was thinking a Lamb package

I could see a David Peralta+ package

[tripleb55]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I could see a David Peralta+ package

Thanks for the reply --

The Rays have plenty of mid-late 20's OF.. I was thinking of a younger player package. and I dont want to give up my starting RF when I am contending..

[brandonholmes]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

like a day but nonetheless. Didn't see Colorado taking him either but they did. I agree has virtually untradable unless he's lighting it up.

How about CarGo? What's the. Best package I could possibly get for him?

I think Reyes isn't totally untradeable, but he'd have to be performing pretty darn well to move him, and you probably wouldn't be getting a ton back for him. You can always do what Toronto did and package him up plus prospects, or maybe package him up with CarGo and take another bad contract for a player you think you can turn around back. I don't know, try to get creative. I would think a healthy CarGo would be pretty valuable around deadline time if he's performing as normal.

[TitoFranc]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

We've talked about this earlier in the thread. That just isn't the case unless the addition you're talking about is just a lottery ticket

Lol it absolutely is the case. Not one single sane person on thsi earth would give up Carrasco to get Joey Gallo. Not a chance in hell.

[TitoFranc]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Don't get me wrong. CC and Salazar are extremely valuable. But it was also biased to believe a headliner of Gallo or Mazara, both top 20 prospects, some sites having them as top 10, would need significant additions to make a trade work.

And Texas would be the team adding. Carrasco is a top 10-12 pitche rin baseball on a long term contract. Gallo is a platoon player right now but he can hit lefties.

The drugs some people are on lol

[AC]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Thanks for the reply --

The Rays have plenty of mid-late 20's OF.. I was thinking of a younger player package. and I dont want to give up my starting RF when I am contending..

Well the Diamondbacks don't exactly have a great farm system so I'm not sure what to tell you. Peralta would be a good fit in LF, maybe Archie Bradley++ if they're waaaaaaaay out of it but I can't see the Rays doing that.

[TitoFranc]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Carrasco out of 70 AL pitchers and 146 MLB pitchers who threw 180 IP over the last 2 years Carrasco ranks 29th (70) in IP so he won't throw a ton of innings however his K rate is 2nd (5th) FIP is 3rd (5th) X-Fip 1st (3rd) SIERA 2nd (3rd) and War 8th (18th) *() is majors rank*

He has some advanced numbers that say if he had a better defense and some better luck he would have pitched as a top 3 pitcher in the AL and top 10 in all of the majors. His K Rate last year at 28.2 is better than Clayton Kershaws magical 2014 season where he posted a 27.6 K Rate.

And his contract pays him a total of about 20 million dollars of over the next 3 years with production that points to him playing like a player that should be getting 20 Mil a year

And all it would take is Joey Gallo to get him? A guy who has a horrific contact rate and cant hit a lefty ? Lol hahah like I said, most overrated prospect baseball has ever seen.

[AC]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

I mean baseball's seen some pretty overrated prospects

[KeanuReevesRules]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Doubt you're getting any ace with control with that package, and I believe the only "ace" rental would be Strasburg. Don't think that's enough for him either.

You'd have to give up a big piece for Kluber or Salazar at this point. Carrasco might be available, but you'd have to give up a decent 3B and CF/RF package.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

[kc2135]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Need some fair trade ideas to unload Votto in my Reds franchise

looking for

_a possible replacement for Votto and some pitching

Ideas?

[AC]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

You'd have to give up a big piece for Kluber or Salazar at this point. Carrasco might be available, but you'd have to give up a decent 3B and CF/RF package.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk

Carrasco is better than Kluber and Salazar

[brandonholmes]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Need some fair trade ideas to unload Votto in my Reds franchise

looking for

_a possible replacement for Votto and some pitching

Ideas?

Are you looking for prospect pitching or major league ready?

How is Votto doing?

[PittsburghFresh]

Re: MLB 16 Trade Discussion Thread

Is this a fair trade? Meadows (B potential CF), Taillon (B potential SP) and Jung ho Kang for Nolan Arenado. I made the trade (I'm the Bucs) but I'm not sure if the values are equal. The trade logic does seem to be better this year and I haven't really taken contracts into question.