Without having a specific deal in mind, Barraclough (MIA) or Bedrosian (LAA) could fit the need. Make sure you pick yourself up something nice to go along with them though, Jr. has quite a bit of value. This is where one of those nasty 3-team deals could come into play.
MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Without having a specific deal in mind, Barraclough (MIA) or Bedrosian (LAA) could fit the need. Make sure you pick yourself up something nice to go along with them though, Jr. has quite a bit of value. This is where one of those nasty 3-team deals could come into play."for love of the game" - B. Chapel -
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Without having a specific deal in mind, Barraclough (MIA) or Bedrosian (LAA) could fit the need. Make sure you pick yourself up something nice to go along with them though, Jr. has quite a bit of value. This is where one of those nasty 3-team deals could come into play.Oakland A's - Seattle Mariners - Detroit TigersPittsburgh Steelers - Green Bay PackersDetroit Red WingsComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Most comparable 3 team trade would be the Wil Myers deal I think. That one was:
Padres get:
Wil Myers, OF (from TB)
Ryan Hanigan, C (from TB)
Gerardo Reyes, RHP (from TB)
Jose Castillo, LHP (from TB)
Rays get:
Steven Souza, OF (from WSH)
Rene Rivera, C (from SD)
Jake Bauers, 1B (from SD)
Burch Smith, RHP (from SD)
Travis Ott, LHP (from WSH)
Nationals get:
Joe Ross, RHP (from SD)
Player to be named (Trea Turner, SS) (from SD)
The problem though is thats really damn complicated. The Astros, Rangers, Mets and maybe some others would love to improve their CF like that but its just hard to project a 3 team trade.Comment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Off the top of my head and open to debate...
Miami - Bradley Jr.
Minnesota - Ozuna
Boston - Barraclough/Perkins/high MIA prospect/mid MIN prospect
Level of prospects to be determined by remaining value between Bradley and Ozuna.
I've never met anyone that likes these things as they get messy quick but if Boston is willing to sell Bradley Jr for relief pitching, it's going to take some creative financing to get it done. I still don't think it covering Jr.'s value but I'm an O's fan"for love of the game" - B. ChapelComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Off the top of my head and open to debate...
Miami - Bradley Jr.
Minnesota - Ozuna
Boston - Barraclough/Perkins/high MIA prospect/mid MIN prospect
Level of prospects to be determined by remaining value between Bradley and Ozuna.
I've never met anyone that likes these things as they get messy quick but if Boston is willing to sell Bradley Jr for relief pitching, it's going to take some creative financing to get it done. I still don't think it covering Jr.'s value but I'm an O's fan
Texas: Jackie Bradley Jr
Boston: Keone Kela, Max Fried, Yoander Mendez, Christian Pache
Braves: Joey Gallo, Blake Swihart
I'm a Braves fan so this may not be correct values, but its hard to try to put these 3 team deals togetherLast edited by GamecocksLaw17; 04-08-2017, 04:31 PM. Reason: I gave the Braves way too much without giving enough first tryComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
I was trying to keep it simple and now that I've thought about it, Colorado (Holland...just signed though) or Oakland (Doolittle) would fill the role of MIN better. Even Mets (Reed) could fit and adjust the prospects accordingly."for love of the game" - B. ChapelComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Controlling atlanta as well, and i love this trade.. also allows me to trade Ruiz for pitching help. What could he fetch in a dealLast edited by kenp86; 04-08-2017, 04:53 PM.Oakland A's - Seattle Mariners - Detroit TigersPittsburgh Steelers - Green Bay PackersDetroit Red WingsComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Do the Yankees have anything they can sell this year? Tanaka would be a rental, Holliday and Pineda don't have much value, and the Yankees will probably want more than anybody is willing to pay for Gardner. If the Yankees fall out of it, is there anybody they can really move for any value?Comment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Do the Yankees have anything they can sell this year? Tanaka would be a rental, Holliday and Pineda don't have much value, and the Yankees will probably want more than anybody is willing to pay for Gardner. If the Yankees fall out of it, is there anybody they can really move for any value?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Bettances could fetch a Miller like package
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Comment
-
Re: MLB 17 Trade Discussion Thread
Off the top of my head
Cubs for Happ as the headliner
Nats, but I don't think they'd give you Robles
Texas would probably give you Gallo plus
Past that it will depend in who is competing, what their bullpen looks like and if anyone lost a closer to injury
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Operation Sports mobile appComment
-
Comment
Comment