Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rob_NYY
    Jedi Master
    • Dec 2004
    • 2495

    #31
    Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

    I rather they just go with all digital faces and do away with the portraits. I know how to do it for Franchise (and I hope to hell they never remove that option. I always worry it's a bug that they'll "fix."), but it sucks in RTTS when my player is the only one with a digital face portrait!

    Comment

    • ninertravel
      MVP
      • Aug 2015
      • 4833

      #32
      Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

      Originally posted by Rob_NYY
      I rather they just go with all digital faces and do away with the portraits. I know how to do it for Franchise (and I hope to hell they never remove that option. I always worry it's a bug that they'll "fix."), but it sucks in RTTS when my player is the only one with a digital face portrait!
      remind me again how do you do the trick?? I know I read years ago how to do it but but can't remember, it's better for consistency to do this I think

      Comment

      • Rob_NYY
        Jedi Master
        • Dec 2004
        • 2495

        #33
        Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

        Originally posted by ninertravel
        remind me again how do you do the trick?? I know I read years ago how to do it but but can't remember, it's better for consistency to do this I think
        Start a Franchise and select 'yes' for Fantasy Draft. When you get to the draft screen, just cancel it and your Franchise will start with players' in-game faces as their portrait.

        Comment

        • ninertravel
          MVP
          • Aug 2015
          • 4833

          #34
          Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

          Originally posted by Rob_NYY
          Start a Franchise and select 'yes' for Fantasy Draft. When you get to the draft screen, just cancel it and your Franchise will start with players' in-game faces as their portrait.
          Thanks I think this is what we have to do this year, I am pretty sure the cut off date for player portraits in the start of February seeing we have about 100 free agents still not signed I can't see it happening now.

          if this continues though. I wonder if the free agents list in rosters is going to be too full and a lot of players won't be in the game because of the limit.

          Comment

          • The Kid 24
            It's Show Time!
            • Jan 2007
            • 14763

            #35
            Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

            Originally posted by ninertravel
            Thanks I think this is what we have to do this year, I am pretty sure the cut off date for player portraits in the start of February seeing we have about 100 free agents still not signed I can't see it happening now.

            if this continues though. I wonder if the free agents list in rosters is going to be too full and a lot of players won't be in the game because of the limit.
            Yea that could really suck.

            Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G920A using Operation Sports mobile app
            Milwaukee Brewers | Green Bay Packers | North Carolina Tar Heels | Wisconsin Badgers

            Comment

            • Rodbird
              Rookie
              • Mar 2004
              • 147

              #36
              Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

              Originally posted by ninertravel
              Thanks I think this is what we have to do this year, I am pretty sure the cut off date for player portraits in the start of February seeing we have about 100 free agents still not signed I can't see it happening now.

              if this continues though. I wonder if the free agents list in rosters is going to be too full and a lot of players won't be in the game because of the limit.
              I’m very worried about this being the case this year. There’s already missing players each year that should be in the game. Please make sure all players are included this year. I’d do away with the legend list to make sure we get all real players that are still free agents.

              Comment

              • ninertravel
                MVP
                • Aug 2015
                • 4833

                #37
                Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                yeah I don't care for the legends list either.

                what is the currently free agents limit now?

                because if there is over 100 free agents not signed now. then all the teams are gonna have fake players,which would usually be taken up by these players and there is no room to add more free agents if it's the same as 17

                unless we have expanded rosters I can see a lot of players missing to counter that

                Comment

                • ShowTyme15
                  LADetermined
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 11853

                  #38
                  Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                  Originally posted by ninertravel
                  yeah I don't care for the legends list either.

                  what is the currently free agents limit now?

                  because if there is over 100 free agents not signed now. then all the teams are gonna have fake players,which would usually be taken up by these players and there is no room to add more free agents if it's the same as 17

                  unless we have expanded rosters I can see a lot of players missing to counter that
                  They players that have gone overseas to the KBO or NBP and into the Indy league will be the players that will most likely be missing.

                  Examples being Tanner Scheppers, Adonis Garcia, Tim Adleman, Hyun-soo Kim, Tyler Wilson, Jared Hoying, and Dillon Gee to name a few. This allows for more FA spots.


                  Also all of these players are already going to be missing in the default roster.


                  EDIT: Wouldn't be surprised if they added more FA slots or another FA list in 18.
                  Last edited by ShowTyme15; 02-04-2018, 08:40 PM.

                  Comment

                  • ninertravel
                    MVP
                    • Aug 2015
                    • 4833

                    #39
                    Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                    Originally posted by ShowTyme15
                    They players that have gone overseas to the KBO or NBP and into the Indy league will be the players that will most likely be missing.

                    Examples being Tanner Scheppers, Adonis Garcia, Tim Adleman, Hyun-soo Kim, Tyler Wilson, Jared Hoying, and Dillon Gee to name a few. This allows for more FA spots.


                    Also all of these players are already going to be missing in the default roster.


                    EDIT: Wouldn't be surprised if they added more FA slots or another FA list in 18.
                    Love it when you do that list every year it's handy!

                    I would love if they added more free agents slots but I don't know if they predicted that this would happen. who knows we may get a surprise next week and we have expanded rosters but I doubt it but hoping!

                    Comment

                    • reyes the roof
                      Hall Of Fame
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 11526

                      #40
                      Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                      Originally posted by ninertravel
                      yeah I don't care for the legends list either.

                      what is the currently free agents limit now?

                      because if there is over 100 free agents not signed now. then all the teams are gonna have fake players,which would usually be taken up by these players and there is no room to add more free agents if it's the same as 17

                      unless we have expanded rosters I can see a lot of players missing to counter that
                      Do they usually put out a roster update on launch day? I think we'll start seeing guys get signed soon so hopefully the free agents will thin out and we'll get an updated roster. Spring Training is right around the corner so it's either take the best offer or wait for someone on a contender to get injured

                      Comment

                      • ninertravel
                        MVP
                        • Aug 2015
                        • 4833

                        #41
                        Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                        Originally posted by reyes the roof
                        Do they usually put out a roster update on launch day? I think we'll start seeing guys get signed soon so hopefully the free agents will thin out and we'll get an updated roster. Spring Training is right around the corner so it's either take the best offer or wait for someone on a contender to get injured
                        Yeah they do release a update, however the portrait issue is pretty much cut off point now one would think, for the example I used early when Cruz and Ian Desmond signed contracts in February their portraits were not in the game

                        Comment

                        • ninertravel
                          MVP
                          • Aug 2015
                          • 4833

                          #42
                          Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                          Let’s see if Davish has a portrait for Cubs if not it will prove the cut off point is Feb 1

                          Comment

                          • Jolly Roger
                            Prince of Plakata
                            • Sep 2011
                            • 871

                            #43
                            Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                            I don't see why they even have a cutoff. EA Sports have no such cutoffs in their games.

                            Comment

                            • ninertravel
                              MVP
                              • Aug 2015
                              • 4833

                              #44
                              Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                              Originally posted by Jolly Roger
                              I don't see why they even have a cutoff. EA Sports have no such cutoffs in their games.
                              EA do their portraits different though they are all on generic white shirts/ these guys go to the effort of putting the Caps of teams on the players head. Hence takes work so they need a cut off point at some stage. I am pretty sure it is early Feb. because the 2 examples I used before on this thread were mid Feb signings Cruz and Desmond.

                              Comment

                              • ninertravel
                                MVP
                                • Aug 2015
                                • 4833

                                #45
                                Re: Rosters Could be very very interesting this year

                                Ok with Hosmer going to the Padres, in Late February.

                                I am interested to see if his portrait will be in the game for the Padres. if it isn't I am guessing the cutoff point was 2 weeks ago

                                Comment

                                Working...