MLB The Show 25 Should Have Something to Prove

[Funkycorm]

Re: MLB The Show 25 Should Have Something to Prove

Go download the OS 100 roster. I forgot who did it, but there’s a thread in the rosters section for it. The guy simmed out 100 years and exported the roster. If anything there is OVR bloat. Most teams have all 5 starters 80+. There are plenty of hitters in the 70s sitting in AAA. Whatever progression problems may exist, the game is certainly capable(at least based on OVR)of producing mlb caliber talent.

Didn't even think about referencing this.

But this absolutely proves the point I have been trying to make.

Thanks.

[Funkycorm]

Re: MLB The Show 25 Should Have Something to Prove

Ok so this is going to be every player above 74 on the 26 man opening day roster in 2034


BAL: 21
BOS: 20
NYY: 21
TB: 17
TOR: 18
CWS: 24
CLE: 26
DET: 17
KC: 23
MIN: 16
HOU: 18
LAA: 19
OAK: 20
SEA: 20
TEX: 25


Lowest overall on any AL team is 63 overall on the 26 man roster.

ATL: 22
MIA: 18
NYM: 19
PHI: 21
WAS: 21
CHC: 23
CIN: 19
MIL: 23
PIT: 19
STL: 21
ARI: 22
COL: 21
LAD: 20
SD: 25
SF: 22

Lowest NL player is 61 on a 26 man roster.

As we can see, player progression is alive and well.

My original numbers with just players drafted in the franchise mode being 74 and over:

BAL: 5
BOS: 10
NYY: 6
TB: 17
TOR: 11
CWS: 12
CLE: 26
DET: 15
KC: 10
MIN: 12
HOU: 6
LAA: 11
OAK: 12
SEA: 5
TEX: 11

169/390 (43%)

ATL: 9
MIA: 11
NYM: 13
PHI: 8
WAS: 16
CHC: 14
CIN: 10
MIL: 11
PIT: 10
STL: 6
ARI: 7
COL: 14
LAD: 10
SD: 7
SF: 9


We can definitely see that players progress decently well and that all of the 30 teams have various amounts of players generated by the game being contributors.

Also 14/29 players rated 90+ are game generated players in draft classes and not prospects already on the base roster. This shows that the talent pool has progressed.