Nice job, swaldo. Way to take a scientific approach to this hot topic!
Once thing I've noticed that I don't believe The Show has captured are the starting pitchers who have slow starts within a game. Pedro Martinez, Josh Beckett, and mid-late era Clemens come to mind where they would absolutely struggle in the early part of the game, especially in the first inning. I'm sure there are other starting pitchers who experience this; maybe it takes them longer to warm up? This is only through my own experiences with the MLB The Show franchise. Has anyone else noticed the same thing?
The other aspect that raises a bit of a red flag for me is the lower number of errors made by The Show in this experiement. Sometimes a comeback is based on a fielding error to which I would have thought the real MLB would have seen more comebacks due to having more errors. Did you also keep track of number of homeruns and/or walks during the experiment? If there is Comeback Code written in The Show, wouldn't the long ball be an easy way to perform a comeback? Were there more HRs hit by The Show in this experiement?
Just curious as I haven't followed this whole controversy too closely...what was the reason for not just simming the games? Could you not get the inning-by-inning box scores if simmed or was there another reason for not simming? Too bad there wasn't an easy way for users to conduct a combined mass experiment kind of like SETI for baseball.
Thanks,
jawgee
Comment