The Comeback AI thread

[brunnoce]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Have SCEA or have SCEA not told you its not broken? They have.

Have you or have you not stated you think it is broken? You have.

You are therefore saying they are lying, because if you believe they are telling you the truth you cannot possibly say its broken.

Its not rocket science this

so, seems u really wanna take this thread to that pacth agian?
please read the rules m8.
we dont need that anymore.

Spoiler

im with dave on this one, disagreeing with SCEA is not calling them liars...
there are alot of stuff involved on the games industry, and if a company decided to admit such a flaw like taht it would be suicide. not saying they did that and i dont think they did, but im sayin that u cant expect a company come clean on a big matter like that...its bad marketing.

now, lets please get back on topic.

[PsychoBulk]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Dave, SCEA's testing procedure is nowhere near as simple as Brian or someone sitting there playing games and forming opinions, you do not honestly think thats how multi billion dollar companies like Sony test a game do you?

It will also involve lots of debugging and code checking, they will have checked the code involved with this section of the game and then be able to say, for a fact, that it is not broken and does what it should do, which is what they have done.

You say they are wrong and it is broken, you are therefore, by default, calling them liars, and frankly that doesnt sit right with me, i think they deserve defending for what they give this community.

Im done with this because you will simply refuse to ever admit you are wrong despite what the makers of the game tell you, and, as i say, they will be basing that on technical code testing which gives them hard, raw, cold, fact, not guys sat around playing it giving opinions, which is what you are doing.

The thread is now yours

[davewins]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Dave, SCEA's testing procedure is nowhere near as simple as Brian or someone sitting there playing games and forming opinions, you do not honestly think thats how multi billion dollar companies like Sony test a game do you?

It will also involve lots of debugging and code checking, they will have checked the code involved with this section of the game and then be able to say, for a fact, that it is not broken and does what it should do, which is what they have done.

You say they are wrong and it is broken, you are therefore, by default, calling them liars, and frankly that doesnt sit right with me, i think they deserve defending for what they give this community.

Im done with this because you will simply refuse to ever admit you are wrong despite what the makers of the game tell you, and, as i say, they will be basing that on technical code testing which gives them hard, raw, cold, fact, not guys sat around playing it giving opinions, which is what you are doing.

The thread is now yours

Hey PB, just to let you know you completley wasted your time with this post. I will not even read your posts anymore at all.

We all know you don't believe in comeback so why you are even in this thread is a question. I have the answer to that question. To argue with people. You just can't keep your mouth shut.

[brunnoce]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Dave, SCEA's testing procedure is nowhere near as simple as Brian or someone sitting there playing games and forming opinions, you do not honestly think thats how multi billion dollar companies like Sony test a game do you?

It will also involve lots of debugging and code checking, they will have checked the code involved with this section of the game and then be able to say, for a fact, that it is not broken and does what it should do, which is what they have done.

You say they are wrong and it is broken, you are therefore, by default, calling them liars, and frankly that doesnt sit right with me, i think they deserve defending for what they give this community.

Im done with this because you will simply refuse to ever admit you are wrong despite what the makers of the game tell you, and, as i say, they will be basing that on technical code testing which gives them hard, raw, cold, fact, not guys sat around playing it giving opinions, which is what you are doing.

The thread is now yours

Rule number 1:
Only people who believe there is comeback. No arguing against it.

Spoiler

isnt that what really matters in the end????
m8 games are made to play, first thing i learned at my course is that game is only good if those "guys" u mention can enjoy it, not if a machine tells u the code is ok....so if the playing results are not showing what those NASA tests u say point out im sorry, but theres something wrong.

cheez...i thought we wouldnt have to deal with this in this thread agian...OMFG.

[phillyfan23]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

ok , so last nite i had another 10-3 game using comeback ON....

It really does make a big difference. I was using Moyer too, and it was against the reds in cinci.


it's nice to get that easy win....as I have the yankees coming up in yankee stadium. should be a toughhh series

[phillyfan23]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

guys....please don't respond to these type of posts. I'm sure it will be taken care of by the Mods here at OS. Don't waste your breath....not worth the aggravation.

[PsychoBulk]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

I have made a clear and fair post, not insulting you Dave, merely giving my points across in a fair and concise manner.

Your reply has sadly shown you arent capable of the same.

As a Community Leader one of my "jobs" if you can call it that is to be somewhat of a link between the community and SCEA, to me defending them on an issue like this is part of that, i know ive seen Jim mention the same on another thread.

Let me finally say this is nothing personal to you or indeed brunnoce (we get on very well in every other thread ) so please dont take it as such, its simply my take on things.

That really was my last post in this thread

Enjoy the game however you wish.

[brunnoce]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

ok , so last nite i had another 10-3 game using comeback ON....

It really does make a big difference. I was using Moyer too, and it was against the reds in cinci.


it's nice to get that easy win....as I have the yankees coming up in yankee stadium. should be a toughhh series

prepare yourself than...cause them yanks can hit man...
our last series i got bombed...they swept me , 2 blow outs and a wild game..my pitching staff is just not good enough to handle their bats...

[davewins]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

pyscho has a problem reading rules. The funny thing is he isn't even arguing with me about the comeback issue. He's saying that I think the dev's are lying. LOL. They answered my question telling me how they determine if an option like this is broken. I took that answer as a matter of opinion because we can do tests as well. They answered me in detail how they came up with their conclusion that it's not broken. I took it as a matter of opinion.

I can't even clear my name in this thread without somebody coming in and disputing it. Telling me that I think that the dev's are lying. It's so childish. I don't understand why people are so argumentative. As if the arguing about the comeback issue wasn't enough he has to argue that I thought the dev's were lying when he is CLEARLY wrong. Unbelievable. I can not believe people on this forum. The lack of maturity seriously AMAZES me.

[phillyfan23]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

.

[davewins]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

I have made a clear and fair post, not insulting you Dave, merely giving my points across in a fair and concise manner.

Your reply has sadly shown you arent capable of the same.

As a Community Leader one of my "jobs" if you can call it that is to be somewhat of a link between the community and SCEA, to me defending them on an issue like this is part of that, i know ive seen Jim mention the same on another thread.

Let me finally say this is nothing personal to you or indeed brunnoce (we get on very well in every other thread ) so please dont take it as such, its simply my take on things.

That really was my last post in this thread

Enjoy the game however you wish.

How in the world am I supposed to not take it personal when you tell me that I am contradicting myself. When you tell me that I really called out the dev's as liars when I clearly didn't. You are too blind to see where I stand on this issue and with the dev's.

[PsychoBulk]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Im done with this thread Dave, you carry on blindly ranting if you wish.

If you want this thread to be kept open then we both need to end it here.

From my side ive said my piece, so im happy to leave it there, hopefully you are too.

[davewins]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Dave, SCEA's testing procedure is nowhere near as simple as Brian or someone sitting there playing games and forming opinions, you do not honestly think thats how multi billion dollar companies like Sony test a game do you?

It will also involve lots of debugging and code checking, they will have checked the code involved with this section of the game and then be able to say, for a fact, that it is not broken and does what it should do, which is what they have done.

You say they are wrong and it is broken, you are therefore, by default, calling them liars, and frankly that doesnt sit right with me, i think they deserve defending for what they give this community.

Im done with this because you will simply refuse to ever admit you are wrong despite what the makers of the game tell you, and, as i say, they will be basing that on technical code testing which gives them hard, raw, cold, fact, not guys sat around playing it giving opinions, which is what you are doing.

The thread is now yours

I'm glad you answered for SCEA. I forgot you work there. If this is true then why do any glitches come out in the game at all?? Why was a visual aid option (fielding marker) broken in the past?? Did they forget to "technical code test" that??

[brunnoce]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

can u 2 please take that via pm's?

[PsychoBulk]

Re: The Comeback AI thread

Im done with this thread Dave, you carry on blindly ranting if you wish.

If you want this thread to be kept open then we both need to end it here.

From my side ive said my piece, so im happy to leave it there, hopefully you are too.

^^^^^