2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
If I were you, I'd stay internal. Duffy is hurt, but how about John Lamb or Will Smith?
If you don't like those options, in addition to AC's list, you could try (from most to least expensive to acquire):
Tom Milone (more like a 3-ish starter on a contender)
Patrick Corbin (I like him a lot)
Zach Britton
Clayton Richard
Travis Wood
Wade Leblanc
Chris Capuano
Erik Bedard (yuck)
You have a TON of trade chips in the bullpen and some IF/OF trade options...(Holland, Collins, Crow, Coleman, Herrera, Getz, Cain, Dyson, Giavotella, Falu), so finding the right deal should be easy. My opinion, KC is the most fun team to trade from/with because they have so few untouchables and so many valuable, young trade chips.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
May I suggest Ted Lilly?"Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Well Milone wouldn't come cheap. But the other guys are all low B or cheaper on the spreadsheet, so none of them would require a king's ransom. I added in Bedard just in case the asker wanted someone who can be had basically for free!Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I did a fantasy draft as the Padres and made my team pitching heavy. My starters are Strasburg/M. Harvey/Masterson/Edwin Jackson/A. Meyer...my bullpen is solid.
I am 4-1 but I haven't been able to score more than 3 runs in a game thus far.
So I threw some trade offers around and have this one as a possibility:
I give:
Paul Konerko
Strasburg
Jackie Bradley
I get:
Mike Trout
Ryan Howard
Brandon McCarthy
SHould I make this trade?
It's a big drop in my starter...but a big gain in offense i feel
ANy thoughts are appreciatedComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I did a fantasy draft as the Padres and made my team pitching heavy. My starters are Strasburg/M. Harvey/Masterson/Edwin Jackson/A. Meyer...my bullpen is solid.
I am 4-1 but I haven't been able to score more than 3 runs in a game thus far.
So I threw some trade offers around and have this one as a possibility:
I give:
Paul Konerko
Strasburg
Jackie Bradley
I get:
Mike Trout
Ryan Howard
Brandon McCarthy
SHould I make this trade?
It's a big drop in my starter...but a big gain in offense i feel
ANy thoughts are appreciated
If you feel you need the help on offense, go for it, but it's not really a fair or realistic deal (and there's really nothing you can do to fix that).
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
No. No no no. No. Konerko is far more valuable. His old player skills have completely blocked a decline and Howard fell off a cliff. He's alright, though, he landed on his big fluffy ridiculous contract.
McCarthy's a good pitcher but he's DL-prone, coming off brain surgery, and Bradley Jr. is a top-100 prospect. Highly disagree with these."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
-
Sent via TapatalkComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
No. No no no. No. Konerko is far more valuable. His old player skills have completely blocked a decline and Howard fell off a cliff. He's alright, though, he landed on his big fluffy ridiculous contract.
McCarthy's a good pitcher but he's DL-prone, coming off brain surgery, and Bradley Jr. is a top-100 prospect. Highly disagree with these.Both of them are overpaid (Howard moreso obviously). And they both have "old person" skills.
Pitchers don't need brains to pitch, right? lol. Bradley got exposed in MLB and McCarthy is still sneaky good. Close to equal, slight edge to McCarthy for me on who's better. Though you are right that Bradley has better long-term value.
All of this is irrelevant however since the main piece of the deal is Trout for Strasburg.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
I did a fantasy draft as the Padres and made my team pitching heavy. My starters are Strasburg/M. Harvey/Masterson/Edwin Jackson/A. Meyer...my bullpen is solid.
I am 4-1 but I haven't been able to score more than 3 runs in a game thus far.
So I threw some trade offers around and have this one as a possibility:
I give:
Paul Konerko
Strasburg
Jackie Bradley
I get:
Mike Trout
Ryan Howard
Brandon McCarthy
SHould I make this trade?
It's a big drop in my starter...but a big gain in offense i feel
ANy thoughts are appreciated
Sent via TapatalkComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
When have you ever known the Braves to give up young starters for discount prices? Aside from Tommy Hanson whose shoulder is made of pudding.Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
BIG IF!! LOL. Have you seen how he's doing so far? Scouts say no breaking ball, fastball is too straight....Plus Vizcaino and Delgado were recently dealt away.
When have you ever known the Braves to give up young starters for discount prices? Aside from Tommy Hanson whose shoulder is made of pudding.
Sent via TapatalkComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan WolverinesComment
-
Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread
I give the edge to the 33 year old over the 37 year old. Howard was bad/hurt last year, but MAN are people forgetting he hit 30+ HRs for 6 straight seasons before last year (and 45+ in 4 of them). HE'S NOT WORTHLESS!!!!!!!Both of them are overpaid (Howard moreso obviously). And they both have "old person" skills.
Pitchers don't need brains to pitch, right? lol. Bradley got exposed in MLB and McCarthy is still sneaky good. Close to equal, slight edge to McCarthy for me on who's better. Though you are right that Bradley has better long-term value.
All of this is irrelevant however since the main piece of the deal is Trout for Strasburg.
Konerko's BB% is still above league average, his K% is completely fine, his ISO is dropping but not a main part of his game, and he continues to get on base. He's cheaper than Howard, more effective, and hasn't dropped off a cliff yet.
McCarthy's wife is pretty nice but he's an injury prone #3. He's not worth JBJ lol.
BIG IF!! LOL. Have you seen how he's doing so far? Scouts say no breaking ball, fastball is too straight....Plus Vizcaino and Delgado were recently dealt away.
When have you ever known the Braves to give up young starters for discount prices? Aside from Tommy Hanson whose shoulder is made of pudding."Twelve at-bats is a pretty decent sample size." - Eric ByrnesComment
Comment