2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

[hradekbr]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

I like Hoz but that's too much

Idk dude, this is a little biased cause I love the man, idk he needs to get his power back

[AC]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Idk dude, this is a little biased cause I love the man, idk he needs to get his power back

Until he does, that's too much

[Gostorm10]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Would a Stanton for Triunfel, Zunino, and Hultzen be both fair and realistic?

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Would a Stanton for Triunfel, Zunino, and Hultzen be both fair and realistic?

You're getting there, but that's about 1/2 price. Stanton requires more 'spects from the pool of Walker/Franklin/Romero/Paxton/Maurer.

[BlueJays09]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

As promised I started my dynasty (SEE SIG BELOW), and thanks to all that helped get my Cano deal right. Enjoy!

[Gostorm10]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

You're getting there, but that's about 1/2 price. Stanton requires more 'spects from the pool of Walker/Franklin/Romero/Paxton/Maurer.

But how do I aquire more than 3 prospects?

[Bronx Bomber03]

Would a Stanton for Triunfel, Zunino, and Hultzen be both fair and realistic?

You are probably going to have to deal Walker. At least in my opinion.

Sent via Tapatalk

[Jakesparrow1008]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Would a Stanton for Triunfel, Zunino, and Hultzen be both fair and realistic?

Not enough. I'd be set on getting Walker in a deal for Stanton if I was the Marlins.

[Bronx Bomber03]

But how do I aquire more than 3 prospects?

You have to make 2 seperate deals.

Sent via Tapatalk

[LifeOfAHooper27792]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Hosmer for Willingham/Perkins?

[Gostorm10]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Not enough. I'd be set on getting Walker in a deal for Stanton if I was the Marlins.

Would I be asking too high for all three of the previously mentioned prospects plus Walker?

[raggBAGG]

About to hit the offseason with the Brewers and I want the speedy Brett Gardner from the yanks to platoon CF with Gomez. Want to trade away Brian Wilson as I used him as a set up to my closer and he just didn't produce the way I wanted him to. Would the yanks take Wilson along with a lower potential prospect for Gardner? Wilson is still highly rated in the game and the Yanks are kind of known for taking on aging vets looking to prove something.

[Gostorm10]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

But if I'm not doing 30-team control then I can't get more than 3, right?

[raggBAGG]

But if I'm not doing 30-team control then I can't get more than 3, right?

If you have forced trades on then I believe you could. I don't know if you can do that in the middle of a franchise though.

[WaitTilNextYear]

Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Would I be asking too high for all three of the previously mentioned prospects plus Walker?

Oh so you are Miami? No, asking for Walker + Zunino + Hultzen + Triunfel would not be asking too much.

If you have forced trades on then I believe you could. I don't know if you can do that in the middle of a franchise though.

30-team control / forced trades doesn't have anything to do with there being a max of 3 slots in a trade. All you have to do is make 2 (or more) separate trades.

For example, and search this thread for more detail since this has been answered 3-4 times already, the OP could send Stanton to SEA for Zunino, Walker, and Hultzen in Trade 1. Then in a separate deal, could send the Marlins' worst prospect/fringe/depth/fake player to SEA for Triunfel in Trade 2.

So the overall deal is Stanton + scrub for Zunino + Walker + Hultzen + Triunfel. Not perfect but best we can do with 3 max slots in a trade.

And, separately, if the OP so chose, he could then use 30-team control to release the throw-in from Seattle's roster, so the "scrub" is ultimately erased from the deal anyway.