2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kmoser
    MVP
    • Jul 2012
    • 1398

    #7531
    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

    Originally posted by Totte
    Viciedo is considered the replacement for Paulie at 1B next year but if the price is right, I'm sure they'd deal him.

    Salty is definitely expendable if the Sox acquired Mauer. Either Cruz/Blanks or Cruz/Keuchel is fine
    Ok for Salty Cruz+Keuchal

    And for Viceado say Blanks+Peacock (82 OVR High B)???

    Comment

    • Totte
      MVP
      • Mar 2005
      • 2919

      #7532
      Originally posted by kmoser
      Ok for Salty Cruz+Keuchal

      And for Viceado say Blanks+Peacock (82 OVR High B)???
      Sounds good, go for it

      I like that deal for the White Sox. Blanks could go 1B instead of Paulie or replace Viciedo in LF. Peacock would add much needed depth to their minors
      Former modder of "Ultimate Rosters" for MVP Baseball 2005.

      Comment

      • kmoser
        MVP
        • Jul 2012
        • 1398

        #7533
        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

        Originally posted by Totte
        Sounds good, go for it

        I like that deal for the White Sox. Blanks could go 1B instead of Paulie or replace Viciedo in LF. Peacock would add much needed depth to their minors
        Alright thanks man. Will do.

        Comment

        • nowitsourtime
          Banned
          • Oct 2011
          • 876

          #7534
          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

          Originally posted by kmoser

          they aquired Mauer last year
          May I dare ask what the Twins traded him for?

          Comment

          • WaitTilNextYear
            Go Cubs Go
            • Mar 2013
            • 16830

            #7535
            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

            Originally posted by D13
            Well not to burst your bubble but Castro is out for 4 weeks and was forced to move him to SS. he's playing terrific ball and hasn't had a error 3 weeks in.

            It was either him or Valbuena at SS. & Luis doesn't have ANY range.

            He's played really well for me at SS in my chise.
            Don't worry, that doesn't have any bearing on real life at all, so it doesn't bust any bubbles here. Barney cannot play SS on a consistent basis at the MLB level. If you can get him to play there in your 'chise as an injury sub, then great.

            Originally posted by KomicJ
            Back to square one I guess...damn ! I really liked to idea of Bruce, but I would have to trade at least two of Masterson/Myers/Jimenez elsewhere before to make it work under the cap. That would kill my rotation, and that's a bit too many changes (3 trades total, since they're aren't part of the Bruce deal).
            I'm a little late to the party, but any trade not originating from the Reds with Jay Bruce in it is 100% unrealistic if that matters to you.

            Originally posted by kmoser
            Would it be realistic for the White Sox to trade Dayan Viciedo?

            Also the Jason Castro just got injured and is out for 2-3 months. The Red Sox put Salty on the block. they aquired Mauer last year and they have 2 catchers below Salty that could be MLB ready. I will offer Rhiner Cruz and Kyle Blanks or Dallas keuchal. I will only trade Blanks if the Viciedo trade goes through.
            Viciedo can be had, in my opinion, but didn't you just get Blanks a few pages back? Would be unrealistic to flip him like that. I'd use another player.

            I also don't think Cruz + Blanks/Keuchel has anywhere close to enough value. Aren't they all low C's or D's? Though Viciedo's available, the deal would have to include a significant piece like Jason Castro, Matt Dominguez, Chris Carter, Jordan Lyles, or a high C/low B spect in some form or fashion.

            A fringe bullpen arm (Cruz), and fringe SP/long reliever (Keuchel), and a 4th/5th OF (Blanks) would not get it done.
            Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

            Comment

            • kmoser
              MVP
              • Jul 2012
              • 1398

              #7536
              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

              Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
              Don't worry, that doesn't have any bearing on real life at all, so it doesn't bust any bubbles here. Barney cannot play SS on a consistent basis at the MLB level. If you can get him to play there in your 'chise as an injury sub, then great.



              I'm a little late to the party, but any trade not originating from the Reds with Jay Bruce in it is 100% unrealistic if that matters to you.



              Viciedo can be had, in my opinion, but didn't you just get Blanks a few pages back? Would be unrealistic to flip him like that. I'd use another player.

              I also don't think Cruz + Blanks/Keuchel has anywhere close to enough value. Aren't they all low C's or D's? Though Viciedo's available, the deal would have to include a significant piece like Jason Castro, Matt Dominguez, Chris Carter, Jordan Lyles, or a high C/low B spect in some form or fashion.

              A fringe bullpen arm (Cruz), and fringe SP/long reliever (Keuchel), and a 4th/5th OF (Blanks) would not get it done.
              They are high C's. And I got Blanks last year so I don't think it would be unrealistic, plus he's been terrible for me so I wanted to get rid of him.

              Comment

              • WaitTilNextYear
                Go Cubs Go
                • Mar 2013
                • 16830

                #7537
                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                Originally posted by kmoser
                They are high C's. And I got Blanks last year so I don't think it would be unrealistic, plus he's been terrible for me so I wanted to get rid of him.
                According to the spreadsheet, Keuchel and Cruz are both low C's so they basically carry no value.

                I also assume that if Blanks (high C) has been terrible for you, his stats are probably bad and the Sox wouldn't be rushing to deal for him. Blanks as a high C is quite generous and I would value him myself more as a low-mid C depending on stats. Sure he's 6'6" with tons of power, but he's really done nothing in MLB in his career to date.

                If Viciedo's (low B) stats over the past 2 seasons are respectable in the slightest, this is a pretty bad deal the Sox would be getting.

                That means it's unrealistic, and perhaps worse, unfair. Sometimes, it helps to try to look at the deal from the other team's perspective too. How do you think this would help the White Sox? Getting quantity over quality is usually something teams do not like to do, unless there are wild card prospects that have enough upside for teams to take a risk on 1 making it out of 3-4 in a deal.


                EDIT: Among your many trades on the board right now, it appears that the Cruz/Keuchel package was intended for Jarrod Saltalamacchia which I just saw. The same argument applies there. Salty is about the same value as Viciedo depending on stats. So, I'd suggest beefing that trade up to make it fair.
                Last edited by WaitTilNextYear; 07-15-2013, 03:28 PM.
                Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                Comment

                • kmoser
                  MVP
                  • Jul 2012
                  • 1398

                  #7538
                  Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                  Originally posted by WaitTilNextYear
                  According to the spreadsheet, Keuchel and Cruz are both low C's so they basically carry no value.

                  I also assume that if Blanks (high C) has been terrible for you, his stats are probably bad and the Sox wouldn't be rushing to deal for him. Blanks as a high C is quite generous and I would value him myself more as a low-mid C depending on stats. Sure he's 6'6" with tons of power, but he's really done nothing in MLB in his career to date.

                  If Viciedo's (low B) stats over the past 2 seasons are respectable in the slightest, this is a pretty bad deal the Sox would be getting.

                  That means it's unrealistic, and perhaps worse, unfair. Sometimes, it helps to try to look at the deal from the other team's perspective too. How do you think this would help the White Sox? Getting quantity over quality is usually something teams do not like to do, unless there are wild card prospects that have enough upside for teams to take a risk on 1 making it out of 3-4 in a deal.


                  EDIT: Among your many trades on the board right now, it appears that the Cruz/Keuchel package was intended for Jarrod Saltalamacchia which I just saw. The same argument applies there. Salty is about the same value as Viciedo depending on stats. So, I'd suggest beefing that trade up to make it fair.
                  Viciedo did horrible in 2013 with a .228 average but is hitting .290 this year. If this is that unrealisticc I could trade someone else and get like a low C prospect to make it more realistic.

                  I did give them Brad Peacock though (82 OVR)mid B
                  Last edited by kmoser; 07-15-2013, 03:37 PM.

                  Comment

                  • kmoser
                    MVP
                    • Jul 2012
                    • 1398

                    #7539
                    Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                    Originally posted by nowitsourtime
                    May I dare ask what the Twins traded him for?
                    The trade happened last year so its not in the transaction log. I looked at the Twins roster and I see Xander Bogarts and David Ross. There may be another minor leaguer that was traded in the deal but I don't know the BoSox farm system well so I couldn't tell.

                    Comment

                    • jbrsanders13
                      Rookie
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 32

                      #7540
                      Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                      Originally posted by Totte
                      One could argue that the Snakes are worried about his arm and that they sold him for 80 cents on the dollar. Given how they have plenty of pitching depth I see nothing wrong with that.



                      How about if Santana makes a speedy recovery and you send him back to the Twins (you mentioned they were somewhat contending). Would be a salary dump for you on a player you're most likely not gonna retain after the season. Something small and simple like Brian Duensing in return (my favorite swingman to use in the whole game as I always pitch well with him).



                      Joe Panik and Heath Hembree from the Giants

                      Sean Nolin and Deck McGuire (low B?) from the Jays

                      Adys Portillo, Brad Brach/Miles Mikolas and Will Venable from the Padres

                      Jesse Biddle, Tyson Gillies and Freddy Galvis from the Phillies (don't recommend trading within the Division)

                      Trevor May, Ryan Pressly and Oswaldo Arcia from the Twins

                      I'd personally try get the Giants or Padres to bite. Panik would become your starting SS in a year or two while Hembree could close or work in setup for Parnell within a year. Getting Portillo from the Padres would net you that valuable SP depth in the minors. Brach/Mikolas could work in setup or close in AAA for now or be an everyday MRP in the majors. Venable would instantly become your best leadoff option with his wheels
                      I like the Santana to the Twins idea. Duensing had a pretty high ERA, I think around 4.75, but if you had success with him I'll give him a try. I signed Dallas Braden to be my swingman and, well...Duensing can't be any worse than him. I also decided to do Niese for Hembree and Panik because I liked how they were both close to major league ready.

                      Wish I could have gotten Venable but since the Padres were contending I had to pass. Just got to find a left-handed hitting OF and my Mets are all set! Thanks for the help!
                      Last edited by jbrsanders13; 07-15-2013, 03:54 PM.

                      Comment

                      • WaitTilNextYear
                        Go Cubs Go
                        • Mar 2013
                        • 16830

                        #7541
                        Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                        Originally posted by kmoser
                        Viciedo did horrible in 2013 with a .228 average but is hitting .290 this year. If this is that unrealisticc I could trade someone else and get like a low C prospect to make it more realistic.

                        I did give them Brad Peacock though (82 OVR)mid B
                        I guess the Peacock + Blanks for Viciedo deal is not the one I have the issue with then. It's more the Cruz + Keuchel for Salty, because that basically gives the Red Sox nothing in return. I'd replace Cruz with one of those players I mentioned above.
                        Chicago Cubs | Chicago Bulls | Green Bay Packers | Michigan Wolverines

                        Comment

                        • KnickNation17
                          Rookie
                          • Feb 2012
                          • 263

                          #7542
                          Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                          Playing 12 The Show as the Mets and was just offered this trade:

                          Mets Get: Archie Bradley

                          Indians Get: Martin Prado

                          Bradley is 20 years old with an A Potential. 4-8 with a 3.94 ERA in AAA

                          Prado is in the last year of his deal and just 29 years old. He's not hitting that well this year. 203 BA in 295 AB with 3 HR and 23 RBI.

                          I don't think this trade is fair for the Indians but I wanted to bring it up to you guys and get your thoughts.

                          Thanks
                          Last edited by KnickNation17; 07-15-2013, 04:16 PM.

                          Comment

                          • nowitsourtime
                            Banned
                            • Oct 2011
                            • 876

                            #7543
                            Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                            Originally posted by KnickNation17
                            Playing 12 The Show as the Mets and was just offered this trade:

                            Mets Get: Archie Bradley

                            Indians Get: Martin Prado

                            Bradley is 20 years old with an A Potential. 4-7 with a 4.11 ERA in AAA

                            Prado is in the last year of his deal and just 29 years old. He's not hitting that well this year. 203 BA in 295 AB with 3 HR and 23 RBI.

                            I don't think this trade is fair for the Indians but I wanted to bring it up to you guys and get your thoughts.

                            Thanks
                            Yeah it's not fair at all

                            Comment

                            • KnickNation17
                              Rookie
                              • Feb 2012
                              • 263

                              #7544
                              Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                              Originally posted by nowitsourtime
                              Yeah it's not fair at all
                              Yeah I didnt think so. I was looking for another starting pitcher I could get from them and I saw this kid Jimmy Nelson. 7-7 with a 4.64 ERA AAA mid to High B. Would Prado be enough or would I have to add more?

                              Comment

                              • kmoser
                                MVP
                                • Jul 2012
                                • 1398

                                #7545
                                Re: 2013 The Show Official Trade Discussion Thread

                                What team would be a fit for Jordan Lyles? 87 OVR high B
                                I would like to get a young decent pitcher with some potential back.

                                Comment

                                Working...