OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Phil Parent
    Rookie
    • Jun 2013
    • 492

    #61
    Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

    I've been busy. Sorry.

    Working on it now.

    BTW, if I'm away like this you can always check what's up with me on Twitter @philparentrx. At least one of you have already found me!

    I REALLY wish we could straight port rosters year to year instead of doing this export import stuff.

    Comment

    • Phil Parent
      Rookie
      • Jun 2013
      • 492

      #62
      Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

      Originally posted by RocketsFan1993
      I have some questions about this.
      1. Are the players going to have career stats edited so players like Cal Ripken Jr. and Tony Gwynn aren't getting first career home runs when playing a franchise? Is this even possible?
      2. You can actually edit service times in MLB The Show 16?
      3. What else still has to be done?
      1: Players who were veterans in 1994 are unlikely to have their first anything in the game, because they have appropriate service time. I'm unlikely to ever do perfect career stats, because that's just cosmetic and not even as obvious as faces and such. At most, I might do it for HOF candidates.

      2: No, what I do is use models that have YOS that put the players in the right position when it comes to free agency. So, the players are about the right number of seasons away from FA, or could be FA at the end of the season, depending of their contract.

      3: A lot, I still have to port from MLB 15. Basically CFs, RFs and Pitchers. Then I'm doing some Birthplaces (Faster than you think) and release.

      Comment

      • Tweeg
        MVP
        • Jul 2008
        • 1414

        #63
        Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

        Funny that you just posted in here today. I was just about to put The Show on the shelf for awhile, and then I thought about finally running a 94 franchise.

        Sent from my LGLS740 using Tapatalk
        Prototype Supreme

        Comment

        • Phil Parent
          Rookie
          • Jun 2013
          • 492

          #64
          Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

          Fielders are done!

          Now doing pitchers. Starting with starters and then doing relievers.

          Comment

          • Phil Parent
            Rookie
            • Jun 2013
            • 492

            #65
            Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

            Starters done. Sunday I do relievers.

            Then I can start with birthplaces and some other housekeeping that needs to be done.

            Comment

            • Culture Rot
              MVP
              • Aug 2011
              • 3018

              #66
              Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

              Welcome back Phil!

              Comment

              • Phil Parent
                Rookie
                • Jun 2013
                • 492

                #67
                Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                Just finished the AL's relievers.

                After I'll have done the NL's, I'll release it as is as a beta. A release is way overdue.

                Not sure how it will play in Franchise without birthplaces and some other fixes, but it should be good enough for Exhibition.

                Comment

                • Culture Rot
                  MVP
                  • Aug 2011
                  • 3018

                  #68
                  Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                  It just seems brighter on these forums with Mr. Parent around and active, I dont know what it is

                  Comment

                  • RocketsFan1993
                    Rookie
                    • Jan 2016
                    • 347

                    #69
                    Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                    Good luck with this. Once I buy MLB the Show 16, I will be playing with this roster along with the 1987 roster that is out and a current roster.

                    Comment

                    • Phil Parent
                      Rookie
                      • Jun 2013
                      • 492

                      #70
                      Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                      Everything is ported. The hang-up has to do that I've got a couple half-done (need to do the stats) players left to complete.

                      It's guys like Podsednik, Hinske, Wigginton... decent prospects, guys who will be helpful as depth or as platoon starters, not everybody can be a B-level or A-Level. Also some D level prospects to fill rosters.

                      The great, great majority of fielders will be in the game now. Didn't have the time to fill NL West.
                      Last edited by Phil Parent; 07-12-2016, 04:38 PM.

                      Comment

                      • RocketsFan1993
                        Rookie
                        • Jan 2016
                        • 347

                        #71
                        Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                        Originally posted by Phil Parent
                        Everything is ported. The hang-up has to do that I've got a couple half-done (need to do the stats) players left to complete.

                        It's guys like Podsednik, Hinske, Wigginton... decent prospects, guys who will be helpful as depth or as platoon starters, not everybody can be a B-level or A-Level. Also some D level prospects to fill rosters.

                        The great, great majority of fielders will be in the game now. Didn't have the time to fill NL West.
                        Will it have full minors of real prospects at the time? Except for Tampa Bay and Arizona of course.

                        Comment

                        • Phil Parent
                          Rookie
                          • Jun 2013
                          • 492

                          #72
                          Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                          They will have full minors too in time, I'll find players to put there. Maybe player #89 and #90 on both teams won't be so hot, but they'll be there and they'll be real.

                          Since we can't put in real draft classes, I've put in players from future drafts on the appropriate teams. My rule is that any draftee who in 1994 would have been 17 or older can be in no matter the draft year, any draftee who has B potential that is 16 can be in, and any draftee who has A potential that is 15 can be in.

                          For Arizona & Tampa, you move the notch down one year: so any of their draftees who in 1994 would have been 16 or older no matter the draft year can be in, any rated B that is 15 or older can be in, and then any rated A that is 14 years or older can be in.

                          All of them in as 18 years olds, because that's the lowest it will go.

                          To me this made for a more exciting roster that is still based in reality, as most those from future draft years are a couple seasons away from reaching their potential or even become useful so it doesn't affect the 1994 play that much.

                          Comment

                          • Culture Rot
                            MVP
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 3018

                            #73
                            Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                            Originally posted by Phil Parent
                            They will have full minors too in time, I'll find players to put there. Maybe player #89 and #90 on both teams won't be so hot, but they'll be there and they'll be real.

                            Since we can't put in real draft classes, I've put in players from future drafts on the appropriate teams. My rule is that any draftee who in 1994 would have been 17 or older can be in no matter the draft year, any draftee who has B potential that is 16 can be in, and any draftee who has A potential that is 15 can be in.

                            For Arizona & Tampa, you move the notch down one year: so any of their draftees who in 1994 would have been 16 or older no matter the draft year can be in, any rated B that is 15 or older can be in, and then any rated A that is 14 years or older can be in.

                            All of them in as 18 years olds, because that's the lowest it will go.

                            To me this made for a more exciting roster that is still based in reality, as most those from future draft years are a couple seasons away from reaching their potential or even become useful so it doesn't affect the 1994 play that much.
                            Phil, I hope you have a full thing typed up that you can so maybe put in the main thread post, people can really know extent of the great depth of this roster. I'm sure there's some people who don't realize or cant fathom the amount of players and prospects in this thing. Were talking deep, deep franchise play here.

                            Comment

                            • RocketsFan1993
                              Rookie
                              • Jan 2016
                              • 347

                              #74
                              Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                              Originally posted by Phil Parent
                              They will have full minors too in time, I'll find players to put there. Maybe player #89 and #90 on both teams won't be so hot, but they'll be there and they'll be real.

                              Since we can't put in real draft classes, I've put in players from future drafts on the appropriate teams. My rule is that any draftee who in 1994 would have been 17 or older can be in no matter the draft year, any draftee who has B potential that is 16 can be in, and any draftee who has A potential that is 15 can be in.

                              For Arizona & Tampa, you move the notch down one year: so any of their draftees who in 1994 would have been 16 or older no matter the draft year can be in, any rated B that is 15 or older can be in, and then any rated A that is 14 years or older can be in.

                              All of them in as 18 years olds, because that's the lowest it will go.

                              To me this made for a more exciting roster that is still based in reality, as most those from future draft years are a couple seasons away from reaching their potential or even become useful so it doesn't affect the 1994 play that much.
                              So on the Astros for example, Roy Oswalt and Lance Berkman would qualify as that?
                              Dang, if only I could afford MLB The Show 16 so I could play this roster when it is done. I probably won't be able to get it until it goes on sale after baseball season ends.

                              Comment

                              • Phil Parent
                                Rookie
                                • Jun 2013
                                • 492

                                #75
                                Re: OS94 (MLB 16) Topic

                                Originally posted by RocketsFan1993
                                So on the Astros for example, Roy Oswalt and Lance Berkman would qualify as that?
                                Dang, if only I could afford MLB The Show 16 so I could play this roster when it is done. I probably won't be able to get it until it goes on sale after baseball season ends.
                                Oh yeah they are. 93 and 97 potential, respectively. Both have Top 50 prospect tags.

                                Comment

                                Working...