#OSFM v3.0

[TripleCrown]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

There is one in the vault. I don't remember the name and am not near the PS4 but I remember it said 2.6 with updates. All I could find they updated was the SCEA roster ratings and the 40 man rosters looked accurate.

I'm waiting for one too. To be honest I won't use a roster in the vault for my franchise unless the guy post something here and certify his is seeded by that super 2.6 roster.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[nycyankeefan52]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

I've got a 40 man OD roster in the works based off 2.6. I always play with OD 90 man.I added players not in 2.6 but are on OD rosters from hybrid,previous OSFM rosters, and last years rosters to be as accurate AAA & AA as possible. DL players in A ball. Replaced some past MLB'ers with stats and service time that were on 2.6 without them.Should be done be weekend.Have Balt to LAA done. I'll upload whay I have done so far so you can see. MY psn starts with TB........

[nycyankeefan52]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

40 man OD 90 man roster in vault under OD90manbased off2.5AAA AA balt-kc

This is actually based off 2.5 not 2.6 sorry

[nycyankeefan52]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

After 2 hours of being on RR.com and trying to put this 40 man together... I give up LOL

The rosters on there don't match with 2.6 because on the site they post the most recent with transactions so the 40-man doesn't match up.

Anyone want to give it a go?



I looked at the Yankees 40 and it was inaccurate unfortunately.

Edit - I don't mind putting the 40 myself. I just need a 40 man roster list that's accurate in time as to when this roster was released.

I saved all OD rosters from mlb aaa aa on excel and make my rosters off them

[nycyankeefan52]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

I could start fresh with 2.6 and make an OD 90 man as accurate as possible roster.I have more players from previous rosters not on 2.6 that are playing this season in AAA & AA.It could be done by Sunday the latest.I won't change ratings or equip but there will be mlb players that I have with stats and service time not on 2.6 I'm organized and quick.I'll release AL OD 90 roster for review based off 2.6.Thanks to Ridin', Scott. and Hybrid guys for the rosters .I love doing this for myself but I want to share an almost 100 % accurate OD roster for those interested.BTW,I'm 56 yo. GO YANKS !!!!!!!

[Gambo187]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

This spreadsheet has the 40-man and even denotes who is not on MLB. It's pretty close to OD so it makes it easy to do in a couple of hours. I'll be using this if no one posts a valid one.

http://www.operationsports.com/forum...-injuries.html

[rjackson]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

The roster I was pointing out was done by happyKILLmore on the 22nd. It is 2.6 with the last SCEA update and 40 man rosters. Some of you have to realize that they cannot be 100% accurate unless you do 30 team control, manually injure, and then add over the 40. So, regardless, you have to do the work or accept that some players destined for the waiver wire won't be on the 40 man.

[TheBigTee]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

The roster I was pointing out was done by happyKILLmore on the 22nd. It is 2.6 with the last SCEA update and 40 man rosters. Some of you have to realize that they cannot be 100% accurate unless you do 30 team control, manually injure, and then add over the 40. So, regardless, you have to do the work or accept that some players destined for the waiver wire won't be on the 40 man.

Sounds look a great roster. I like 40 man rosters but don't really care for them to be perfectly accurate. Thanks!


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[Gambo187]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

The roster I was pointing out was done by happyKILLmore on the 22nd. It is 2.6 with the last SCEA update and 40 man rosters. Some of you have to realize that they cannot be 100% accurate unless you do 30 team control, manually injure, and then add over the 40. So, regardless, you have to do the work or accept that some players destined for the waiver wire won't be on the 40 man.

This roster is actually pretty good in regards to the 40man from what I can see. The aforementioned Yankees had Gurka and Mantiply on the 40-man instead of Kozma and Herrera and maybe a couple other tweaks. Either way it took less than a minute to fix the Yanks.

On another small note and totally opinion. I know roster making is hard and tedious work especially in a game without an external editor and one that will rearrange rosters automatically during the process if one thing is wrong. So for that reason alone, considering the work already put in, I will never criticize a roster maker for deciding not to do 40-man rosters. However, because of how simple it is to remove guys from a 40-man to make a 25 and the difficulty of finding a 40 man roster source that matches the date of the released roster, a 40-man base does appear to satisfy a larger base of potential users and makes the roster more flexible "out of the box". (I also think it would cut down on posts like these that are just people searching for a 40-man and figuring out if the random user posting it hasn't nerfed something)

[TripleCrown]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

This roster is actually pretty good in regards to the 40man from what I can see. The aforementioned Yankees had Gurka and Mantiply on the 40-man instead of Kozma and Herrera and maybe a couple other tweaks. Either way it took less than a minute to fix the Yanks.



On another small note and totally opinion. I know roster making is hard and tedious work especially in a game without an external editor and one that will rearrange rosters automatically during the process if one thing is wrong. So for that reason alone, considering the work already put in, I will never criticize a roster maker for deciding not to do 40-man rosters. However, because of how simple it is to remove guys from a 40-man to make a 25 and the difficulty of finding a 40 man roster source that matches the date of the released roster, a 40-man base does appear to satisfy a larger base of potential users and makes the roster more flexible "out of the box". (I also think it would cut down on posts like these that are just people searching for a 40-man and figuring out if the random user posting it hasn't nerfed something)

They can't be 100% accurate lineup wise and anyway will be shuffled once you start a franchise. I'm not too picky on a 40-man roster as long as they used Ridin's 2.6 and they didn't modify ratings or imported new players.

Think I'll give that one a try.

Thx guys for your work

[rjackson]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

This roster is actually pretty good in regards to the 40man from what I can see. The aforementioned Yankees had Gurka and Mantiply on the 40-man instead of Kozma and Herrera and maybe a couple other tweaks. Either way it took less than a minute to fix the Yanks.

On another small note and totally opinion. I know roster making is hard and tedious work especially in a game without an external editor and one that will rearrange rosters automatically during the process if one thing is wrong. So for that reason alone, considering the work already put in, I will never criticize a roster maker for deciding not to do 40-man rosters. However, because of how simple it is to remove guys from a 40-man to make a 25 and the difficulty of finding a 40 man roster source that matches the date of the released roster, a 40-man base does appear to satisfy a larger base of potential users and makes the roster more flexible "out of the box". (I also think it would cut down on posts like these that are just people searching for a 40-man and figuring out if the random user posting it hasn't nerfed something)

The teams I spot checked seemed right on. We all need to keep in mind that OFSM is intended to be a base roster of which others can edit to their desire, which I have done and will continue to do. It is like open source software that needs a little word of mouth to advance. Ridin gets that initial base done and then tends to want to do more for us since we all appreciate it so much. He has outdone himself this year and I am truly appreciative. I'll be importing this franchise for years to come barring SCEA changes in how it handles things.

[TheBigTee]

#OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

The roster I was pointing out was done by happyKILLmore on the 22nd. It is 2.6 with the last SCEA update and 40 man rosters. Some of you have to realize that they cannot be 100% accurate unless you do 30 team control, manually injure, and then add over the 40. So, regardless, you have to do the work or accept that some players destined for the waiver wire won't be on the 40 man.

After looking into this roster I believe it is based off of OSFM 2.5 and not 2.6. Something to be aware of. In Ridin's newest update Gleybar Torres is listed as a 3B and in this roster he is not.

Anybody aware of a 2.6 with scea updates and/or 40 man?


Sent from my iPhone using Operation Sports

[Geolink]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

If there's a way Ridin (like he needs any more work LOL) or anyone on the OSFM team can put together a spreadsheet of the 40-man roster for all the teams that's compatible to the OSFM 25-man roster. That would be amazing for so many people like myself.

Like I said, I don't mind putting the 40 man and doing 30-team roster control if the correct information is out there for us to have as a guide.

Yesterday I spent hours trying to put it together in Franchise mode and just couldn't because every site uses new roster information which doesn't match up with the roster so I had problems with inaccurate 40-man, and possible important pieces being left off the 40 because the spots were filled. I would like to start the Franchise as accurate as possible and let the chips fall where they may with the CPU randomness while I focus on my team.

[Figment]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

If there's a way Ridin (like he needs any more work LOL) or anyone on the OSFM team can put together a spreadsheet of the 40-man roster for all the teams that's compatible to the OSFM 25-man roster. That would be amazing for so many people like myself.

Like I said, I don't mind putting the 40 man and doing 30-team roster control if the correct information is out there for us to have as a guide.

Yesterday I spent hours trying to put it together in Franchise mode and just couldn't because every site uses new roster information which doesn't match up with the roster so I had problems with inaccurate 40-man, and possible important pieces being left off the 40 because the spots were filled. I would like to start the Franchise as accurate as possible and let the chips fall where they may with the CPU randomness while I focus on my team.

This would be a pointless task. Not only do 40-Man rosters change everyday, but the information is easily available. If you go to any team's official website, put your cursor over the roster tab at the top it will bring down different roster options (Active Roster, Transactions, Injury Updates, etc), select the option for 40-Man Roster and it is available to you. The team websites are almost always up to date with roster information.

[Geolink]

Re: #OSFM V2.0 and V2.5

This would be a pointless task. Not only do 40-Man rosters change everyday, but the information is easily available. If you go to any team's official website, put your cursor over the roster tab at the top it will bring down different roster options (Active Roster, Transactions, Injury Updates, etc), select the option for 40-Man Roster and it is available to you. The team websites are almost always up to date with roster information.

Did you read what I wrote?

I said if there can be a spreadsheet created that's based around the time that the roster is based on that would be great.

40-man roster is consistently changed whether it be trades, injuries, DFA, or new signing almost every day on any team. When you try to recreate this on a roster that is now a week or two old, it won't be as pin accurate as you want.

Do you get what I'm trying to say?

Edit - I don't want to start an argument here. So I'll try to keep the peace in here as much as possible. Everyone worked so much for these rosters that it's best if I leave it alone.