#OSFM v3.0
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
If I use v3.2 and just set up 30 team control I can sim through Spring Training and lineups will stay intact?Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Just loaded up the v3.2 roster and I'm seeing Foltynewicz with a 74 rating. What's up with that?
And I thought v3.2 was a 40-man set but it doesn't seem to be if I'm looking at the right one. Not sure how it wouldn't be the right one. I DLed it and loaded it with no issues but it seems something may be amiss.Last edited by Chunky_Cracker; 08-10-2017, 12:57 AM.Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Hey Ridin,
I noticed something on your OSFM and the HYBRID rosters that I wanted to give you a heads up on. It was the same on 2016 as well. Even SCEA rosters has this glitch.
I haven't had time to go over the whole league yet to write down who all has it again this year, but I did notice a handful already while I was editing other stuff.
SUN GLASSES ON PITCHER GLITCH:
During MLB THE SHOW 16 starting with default rosters there was this glitch where some pitchers would have SUN GLASSES on like Brad Brach and about 40 others and when you go to look under EDIT PLAYER all you had to do was move top thing on sun glasses section left then right as it will say NONE when you first go on the player but they were wearing shades for some reason.
Now on MLB THE SHOW 17 it returned and every roster out currently has this glitch. It doesn't look as bad as it was last year but it is there and a very easy fix.
Here is a few players I noticed who have it.
SP Matt Shoemaker
RP Huston Street
RP Brad Brach
RP Brandon Mauer
RP Tony Sipp
SP Sony Gray
Attached FilesLast edited by Houston; 08-10-2017, 01:06 AM.Youtube: https://youtube.com/@mlbnetworkleagu..._hz5M86fl-FbW4
LEAGUE APPLICATION: https://www.emailmeform.com/builder/...SccoOR406j29tF
Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Didn't see the 3.2 set yet, but for the White Sox in the 3.0 set, DJ Peterson is in FA which works out perfect since Grant Green was released recently. Works out perfect there to release green and add Peterson.Comment
-
#OSFM v3.0
I haven't seen the 3.2 so they could have been fixed but i remember these guys needed to be updated on the Yankees in the 3.0.
Specially Chad Green who was 59 OVR and C pot and now he's 77 and B (84)
Sent from my iPhone using TapatalkRoster Creator
Statcast 90 ft times converted to MLB The Show Ratings:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets...it?usp=sharingComment
-
Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Just loaded up the v3.2 roster and I'm seeing Foltynewicz with a 74 rating. What's up with that?
And I thought v3.2 was a 40-man set but it doesn't seem to be if I'm looking at the right one. Not sure how it wouldn't be the right one. I DLed it and loaded it with no issues but it seems something may be amiss.
10 char.Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
When you edit players and you want to add more positions then are the choices for secondary positions, how do you do that?? I hope that made sense and thanks in advance...Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Hey Ridin,
I noticed something on your OSFM and the HYBRID rosters that I wanted to give you a heads up on. It was the same on 2016 as well. Even SCEA rosters has this glitch.
I haven't had time to go over the whole league yet to write down who all has it again this year, but I did notice a handful already while I was editing other stuff.
SUN GLASSES ON PITCHER GLITCH:
During MLB THE SHOW 16 starting with default rosters there was this glitch where some pitchers would have SUN GLASSES on like Brad Brach and about 40 others and when you go to look under EDIT PLAYER all you had to do was move top thing on sun glasses section left then right as it will say NONE when you first go on the player but they were wearing shades for some reason.
Now on MLB THE SHOW 17 it returned and every roster out currently has this glitch. It doesn't look as bad as it was last year but it is there and a very easy fix.
Here is a few players I noticed who have it.
SP Matt Shoemaker
RP Huston Street
RP Brad Brach
RP Brandon Mauer
RP Tony Sipp
SP Sony Gray
Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Just loaded up the v3.2 roster and I'm seeing Foltynewicz with a 74 rating. What's up with that?
And I thought v3.2 was a 40-man set but it doesn't seem to be if I'm looking at the right one. Not sure how it wouldn't be the right one. I DLed it and loaded it with no issues but it seems something may be amiss.
No one said 3.2 was 40....its not and foltynewicz is an 82 so not sure what your looking at
Sent from my iPhone using Operation SportsFollow me on Twitter: twitter.com / @RidinRostersComment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
I just based it on this comment of yours in the OP: "I will release this as an accurate 40 man roster." I figured that meant all subsequent releases would follow that dictate. Sorry for assuming, I guess.
Well I went to the Roster Vault, downloaded your v3.2 dated August 8th 2017 and saved it to my PS4, went to the Data Utility and loaded the downloaded roster so I should be looking at the v3.2 of your roster but when I view it in Roster Control -> Lineups or in the Player Editor it shows him with a 74 rating.
Not trying to be difficult just wondering what's going on.Last edited by Chunky_Cracker; 08-10-2017, 07:46 PM.Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
I just based it on this comment of yours in the OP: "I will release this as an accurate 40 man roster." I figured that meant all subsequent releases would follow that dictate. Sorry for assuming, I guess.
Well I went to the Roster Vault, downloaded your v3.2 dated August 8th 2017 and saved it to my PS4, went to the Data Utility and loaded the downloaded roster so I should be looking at the v3.2 of your roster but when I view it in Roster Control -> Lineups or in the Player Editor it shows him with a 74 rating.
Not trying to be difficult just wondering what's going on.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: #OSFM v3.0
Well I went to the Roster Vault, downloaded your v3.2 dated August 8th 2017 and saved it to my PS4, went to the Data Utility and loaded the downloaded roster so I should be looking at the v3.2 of your roster but when I view it in Roster Control -> Lineups or in the Player Editor it shows him with a 74 rating.
Not trying to be difficult just wondering what's going on.
I think Ridin is mixing up Foltynewicz potential, which someone recently mistakenly thought was 74 but is actually an 82.Comment
Comment