Full Minors Roster with More Realistic Potentials

[blemons5]

Re: Full Minors Roster with More Realistic Potentials

Usually it is just potential edits for a lot, ages for a lot, and some overall increases. Nothing too major.

I have 2 franchises on 21 and to be honest haven't played in a few weeks. But that is not because of the roster. The gameplay is giving me personal fits right now.

One is in 2031 (simmed here doing edits and everything yearly) and playing 2031 because it matches 2021 schedule. The second is in 2026 (again simulating to 2031 to play eventually).

For the first, I used my roster with deflated potentials that was based off the first roster update on game release. The second is my edited potential roster based off of the first FM update. My PSN is Doctordoof36 if you are interested in the second based off of FM.

I spent a lot of time muting potentials and did some through testing on how it looks multiple years in. Pairing this with my edits creates a create looking and healthy franchise.

Best part about my roster based on FM, I only adjusted potentials and nothing else so it will play exactly like the FM roster does. Looking at it, it may seem a bit too deflated but you have to embrace the average overall player rating of 74-76 to appreciate it. My edits work great with it and have been designed over, now 4 iterations, to mesh well with the FM riding rosters.

Yeah the 74-76 range is what I like too as far as realism. Ideally, the rating breakdown 5 years down the line would be similar to the current official roster as far as number of 90+ guys, 80+, and so on. I’ll give your roster and some others a look when I have some free time and decide which to use. Thanks for all the info!

[ViatorLion10]

Re: Full Minors Roster with More Realistic Potentials

Ok that doesn’t sound bad at all. How many players do you typically have to re-rate? And which roster do you use for your franchise?

I use my own edited roster building off of Cycloniac's base. I'm almost finished with it, but unfortunately I am in the middle of studying for a final exam and won't be able to work on finalizing it too much in the coming days. Almost assuredly will have it posted in the vault by next Monday night and I'll make a thread post on here.

[Funkycorm]

Re: Full Minors Roster with More Realistic Potentials

Yeah the 74-76 range is what I like too as far as realism. Ideally, the rating breakdown 5 years down the line would be similar to the current official roster as far as number of 90+ guys, 80+, and so on. I’ll give your roster and some others a look when I have some free time and decide which to use. Thanks for all the info!

No worries.

I am not really a big roster editor. There are some other great rosters here to check out as well.

[lemarflacco]

Re: Full Minors Roster with More Realistic Potentials

How much work is it to edit draft classes? Like would I be better off to just deal with the higher than realistic potentials and not have to edit draft classes? I’m a big Braves fan and very familiar with their system and a lot of the potentials just don’t really make any sense in that there’s a lot of guys who are overrated or non-prospects with higher potentials than real prospects. If nothing else, it would at least be nice if the correct guys were the ones with higher potentials as opposed to AAAA filler type guys

If you're simming I think it can be daunting , but I play every game so I will edit the potentials like once series for a diff team each team. Ill even take caps of real college players , video them, and replace the drafted players with those. But I dont have the patience to do that all at once so like one player and one team per series I play.

[marleyville48]

Re: Full Minors Roster with More Realistic Potentials

I'm currently working on a roster that accounts for this, but I can't start a thread on this site yet. as soon as this site allows me to post I'll put it up to download.