High Heat interview at BBSC

[Diablo25]

Re: High Heat interview at BBSC

Oh

[Drew127]

Re: High Heat interview at BBSC

I will agree that the graphics in last year's HH (I'm talking the PS2 version, btw) were sub-standard. Any human would be able to see that.

But, it still looked like baseball. I dunno, I mean the general feel of the graphics just felt right, and somehow added to the charm of the game. I think the basic graphics were good...the architecture, the dimensions, all that stuff was dead on...what sucked was the textures that covered all the architecture and players. Like the grass texture and the dirt textures. Those really sucked. I think if they just improved the texture mapping it would do tons for the look of the game. As I said, the stadiums looked right...just had ****ty textures on them that's all. I hope you guys can follow what I'm saying.

[Graphik]

Re: High Heat interview at BBSC

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
I will agree that the graphics in last year's HH (I'm talking the PS2 version, btw) were sub-standard. Any human would be able to see that.

But, it still looked like baseball. I dunno, I mean the general feel of the graphics just felt right, and somehow added to the charm of the game. I think the basic graphics were good...the architecture, the dimensions, all that stuff was dead on...what sucked was the textures that covered all the architecture and players. Like the grass texture and the dirt textures. Those really sucked. I think if they just improved the texture mapping it would do tons for the look of the game. As I said, the stadiums looked right...just had ****ty textures on them that's all. I hope you guys can follow what I'm saying.

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I hear ya, thats exactly how I felt. When I played 2002 I could'nt stand looking at that choppy piece of crap. Then in 2003 it got better, besides the karate kick slides and the glued togather hands it was much more toleratable. But you're right, the textures are PS1 type.