Player & Team Ratings

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baa7
    Banned
    • Jul 2004
    • 11691

    #16
    Re: Player & Team Ratings

    Originally posted by HK-47
    LOL!Yankees #1???
    Plus A-Rod has a few new glove-slapping and yelling "Mine!" as he's rounding third plays up his sleeve.

    Comment

    • BadKermit
      Rookie
      • Feb 2004
      • 482

      #17
      Re: Player & Team Ratings

      Originally posted by baa7
      Ratings are based on 3 year stat averages. 85 is more than generous for him.
      No, it's not. He's the best SS in baseball (sorry, Cover Boy). A 95 would have been more accurate for him than an 85. Three-year averages are fine and dandy, but they should have also taken into account trends. Hanley is trending up, and he should be rated as high or higher than Reyes, Rollins, Jeter, etc.

      I'll take Hanley's MLB-leading .948 OPS last year over any other SS in baseball (nearly SEVENTY-FIVE points higher than the #2 SS, Rollins). If Hanley didn't play in Florida, people might have noticed him by now.
      Of course, if Dawson gets hot, and
      Sutcliffe comes through, and....
      Pa, see what you did to me?

      - Mike Royko

      Comment

      • theMUHMEshow
        Rookie
        • Jul 2006
        • 160

        #18
        Re: Player & Team Ratings

        That is exactly what I was thinking!!

        Comment

        • Deelron
          Rookie
          • Feb 2006
          • 199

          #19
          Re: Player & Team Ratings

          Originally posted by BadKermit
          No, it's not. He's the best SS in baseball (sorry, Cover Boy). A 95 would have been more accurate for him than an 85.
          Exactly so, even when his weak defense is taken into account he blows the others out of the water. Additionally, this 3 year average stuff is just not true, there's no way an average of AA ball, top 3 SS in the league (offense), top SS in the league (offense) is an 85 when last year he was also an 85 in the last edition of the game (you know, the 2 minor league seasons averaged in).

          The ratings are clearly broken (and overall rating is the worst of the bunch) and it's very clear that a rating system that goes beyond "the roster guy" is needed, preferably one based off of some of the more accurate projection systems, not guesswork.

          Comment

          • brendanrfoley
            MVP
            • Jul 2002
            • 1552

            #20
            Re: Player & Team Ratings

            I see once again, we need a jump to conclusions mat!

            Guys, we have no idea how the ratings are determined, or if they fluctuate with age. Lets all take a step back away from the ledge, and wait to play the game and see how players perform.

            That said, there's no way the Yanks are #1 ! The Red Sox have a better roster heading into camp this year than they did last, and they whupped up the Yanks pretty good!

            Comment

            • BadKermit
              Rookie
              • Feb 2004
              • 482

              #21
              Re: Player & Team Ratings

              Originally posted by brendanrfoley
              I see once again, we need a jump to conclusions mat!

              Guys, we have no idea how the ratings are determined, or if they fluctuate with age. Lets all take a step back away from the ledge, and wait to play the game and see how players perform.

              That said, there's no way the Yanks are #1 ! The Red Sox have a better roster heading into camp this year than they did last, and they whupped up the Yanks pretty good!
              To be clear, I'm not upset about the ratings. I'm just reacting to baa's statement. The beauty of the ratings is that we can change them. I'll be giving Hanley the boosts he deserves.
              Of course, if Dawson gets hot, and
              Sutcliffe comes through, and....
              Pa, see what you did to me?

              - Mike Royko

              Comment

              • Chad Rogers
                Banned
                • Jan 2008
                • 140

                #22
                Re: Player & Team Ratings

                The Yankees are not #1, the Sox are. The numbers we have seen are from an old build.

                Chad

                Comment

                • sirwoodz
                  Rookie
                  • Mar 2007
                  • 240

                  #23
                  Re: Player & Team Ratings

                  I usually like to start my franchise with the worst team and then try to take them to the championship...marlins here i come!!

                  Comment

                  Working...