MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • liberaluser
    Rookie
    • Sep 2009
    • 189

    #61
    Re: MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

    I've only played the demo for the most recent MLB 2k game and was annoyed I couldn't put on button controls and was stuck with the odd stick twirling pitching type.

    I wanted to know how button pitching feels since it's always ignored, and also in comparison to "the other game" if that's allowed.

    Comment

    • Charles Hustle
      Rookie
      • Feb 2012
      • 58

      #62
      Re: MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

      Why do all the screens in the previews look like they are from a PS2?

      Comment

      • bosnian19
        Banned
        • Jul 2011
        • 413

        #63
        Re: MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

        Originally posted by Charles Hustle
        Why do all the screens in the previews look like they are from a PS2?
        thats 2k for you

        Comment

        • Blzer
          Resident film pundit
          • Mar 2004
          • 42515

          #64
          Re: MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

          Originally posted by Charles Hustle
          Why do all the screens in the previews look like they are from a PS2?
          Honestly, the unsuspecting answer might be that this could very well be a PS2 screengrab.

          ... but it isn't, since they haven't rebuilt the visuals for that game since 2K6. This could, however, be from an overcast game, since they lose all shadow detail in those (and night games in past versions).
          Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60

          Comment

          • Schreck
            Rookie
            • Jul 2008
            • 165

            #65
            Re: MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

            Maybe I'm not cynical enough, but I really thought it was a decent looking game last year. I haven't played the Show, but based on videos I've seen it is clearly a lot better looking game, but I still think 2K is fine. More important to me is if the game plays well, and by and large I really enjoyed playing it. I got fairly realistic results and was usually challenged. I didn't win every game against the cpu, which was great.

            Anyway, the review seemed really encouraging to me, I am looking forward to the game and will probably buy it if it gets good reviews at all. So far the press I've seen seems positive, which is a good start because most sites seem to write this game off each year.

            Comment

            • Trevytrev11
              MVP
              • Nov 2006
              • 3259

              #66
              Re: MLB 2K12 Developer Diary #1 - Gameplay (Part 1)

              Originally posted by Big Jim
              As for zone or cursor hitting, I kind of get why people want them. But it is pretend skill that replicate hitting at all. I never had to try and aim for the ball past first grade. It has been about form and timing ever since.
              I think I understand the point you are trying to make in the sense that the hitters swing location is more instinctual than anything else. See pitch away, swing away. See pitch up high, swing up high. A hitter is not going to swing in the dirt at a pitch over his head.

              I get that and to a point, I understand and maybe even agree, but I'll play devils advocate because I do agree that more should be involved.

              But can't the same be said for timing as well? Just as a hitters reaction tells him where to swing, it also tells him when to swing.

              But....just like a pitcher tries to changes speeds to mess up a hitters timing, he also changes location to throw a hitter off as well. He cuts and sinks the ball in attempt to miss bats and more importantly miss barrels.

              Just as hitters swing early and late, they also swing over and under a pitch. They get jammed and they cue balls of the end of the bat. Some times a guy swings and misses on a curve because he is way too far out front and sometimes he just swings over it.

              So why let the system automatically control one and not the other?

              IMO, it all comes down to how much of the output should be determined by the ratings vs. how much should be determined by the user input. In a perfect world, the games difficulty level would adapt to the users ability and allow the user to control as much of the swing as he wanted and still produce realistic results. That is my perfect world. I play video games because I want to control everything, but at the same time, I still want realistic outcomes. I don't want the game to intentionally try and normalize what I've accomplished in order to get back to normal, but instead it should happen naturally.

              And why are there different trains of through between pitching and hitting.

              Hitting for the most part is timing only where the games calculations determine the rest.

              Pitching on the other hand, is almost entirely up to the user. The location, the speed / effort and effectiveness are all determined by the users input within whatever range the players ratings allow.

              If it were comparable to the hitting system, the user would simply select the pitch type and location, press a button and let the players ratings determine the outcome.

              As much as I liked the zone (cursor) system that 2K offered a few years ago, it was a bit more than what a hitter goes through to put the bat on the ball, but, IMO, the results were worth it as they were based on the contact you made not that the game decided you should make.

              Comment

              Working...