I heard that back in the day, around Babe Ruth era, that walks counted as hits, which contributed to these old-timers batting around .360 all the time. Anyone else know about this?
Major bug found@@@@
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Hmm, rather odd. Never heard that one.Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Hmm, rather odd. Never heard that one.Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Hmm, rather odd. Never heard that one.Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dork88 said:
I heard that back in the day, around Babe Ruth era, that walks counted as hits, which contributed to these old-timers batting around .360 all the time. Anyone else know about this?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
That was like in 1890 or something.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dork88 said:
I heard that back in the day, around Babe Ruth era, that walks counted as hits, which contributed to these old-timers batting around .360 all the time. Anyone else know about this?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
That was like in 1890 or something.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
dork88 said:
I heard that back in the day, around Babe Ruth era, that walks counted as hits, which contributed to these old-timers batting around .360 all the time. Anyone else know about this?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
That was like in 1890 or something.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Actually guys, reaching on an error doesn't count towards your on base percentage. It goes down as an 0 for 1 in both batting average and on base percentage. On Base percentage is figured by taking hits+walks+hit by pitches/plate appearances. Sorry to burst your bubble.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Actually guys, reaching on an error doesn't count towards your on base percentage. It goes down as an 0 for 1 in both batting average and on base percentage. On Base percentage is figured by taking hits+walks+hit by pitches/plate appearances. Sorry to burst your bubble.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Actually guys, reaching on an error doesn't count towards your on base percentage. It goes down as an 0 for 1 in both batting average and on base percentage. On Base percentage is figured by taking hits+walks+hit by pitches/plate appearances. Sorry to burst your bubble.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Anyways, yes, an Error = an AB. An AB where you went 0 for 1 because you did not receive a hit.
If a pitcher throws a no hitter but someone gets on base via an error then that pitcher is still credited with a no-hitter. Because the pitcher gave up zero hits, yet someone got on base via error.
Baseball statistics are all about assigning CREDIT and BLAME.
Fielding percentage? How often a player makes the catch.
Batting average? How oftend does the player get a hit (hit as in an H, not a physical hit.)
That's why ERA, a very standard measure of pitching ability, doesn't factor in unearned runs, because the pitcher has no control over UNearned runs, so cannot be responsible for them one way or the other. Since ERA is meant to reflect the runs a pitcher gives up, factoring in runs some fielder gives up would destroy its value as a stat.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Anyways, yes, an Error = an AB. An AB where you went 0 for 1 because you did not receive a hit.
If a pitcher throws a no hitter but someone gets on base via an error then that pitcher is still credited with a no-hitter. Because the pitcher gave up zero hits, yet someone got on base via error.
Baseball statistics are all about assigning CREDIT and BLAME.
Fielding percentage? How often a player makes the catch.
Batting average? How oftend does the player get a hit (hit as in an H, not a physical hit.)
That's why ERA, a very standard measure of pitching ability, doesn't factor in unearned runs, because the pitcher has no control over UNearned runs, so cannot be responsible for them one way or the other. Since ERA is meant to reflect the runs a pitcher gives up, factoring in runs some fielder gives up would destroy its value as a stat.Comment
-
Re: Major bug found@@@@
Anyways, yes, an Error = an AB. An AB where you went 0 for 1 because you did not receive a hit.
If a pitcher throws a no hitter but someone gets on base via an error then that pitcher is still credited with a no-hitter. Because the pitcher gave up zero hits, yet someone got on base via error.
Baseball statistics are all about assigning CREDIT and BLAME.
Fielding percentage? How often a player makes the catch.
Batting average? How oftend does the player get a hit (hit as in an H, not a physical hit.)
That's why ERA, a very standard measure of pitching ability, doesn't factor in unearned runs, because the pitcher has no control over UNearned runs, so cannot be responsible for them one way or the other. Since ERA is meant to reflect the runs a pitcher gives up, factoring in runs some fielder gives up would destroy its value as a stat.Comment
Comment