</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
wwharton said:
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
srudoff said:
actually i'm really not as interested in the results as I am to find out why all of the self-proclaimed serious baseball sim fans have accepted this game at face value with no long term testing. isn't a HUGE part of being a serious sim baseball fan based on how a game's dynasty/franchise mode works?
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
So this is yet ANOTHER thread created just to start a war. You don't care about the results, just to know that someone's testing? You just need validation to bitch about something?
For your information 100's of people test games as soon as they get them. Some just have things jump out at them so it's not even like they know they're testing. Like you, many only post when they find problems. Some happy they found a flaw to make the game look bad and others posting to let others know and hope to find a solution. Usually when there aren't many posts like that it means there aren't many issues to worry about. There is no conspiracy to hide the flaws of the game so people like it better than another game. Hate to burst your bubble on that. If you're dying to find out what's wrong with the game then figure it out on your own. When you do, let me know b/c I haven't found anything big yet.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Exactly. Nothing like someone trying to start a war over nothing.
Srudoff - You also posted this same topic at hh2004.net - LINK
If you are really concerned about these long term tests, go out and rent the game and test it.
I'll also add that being a serious sim baseball fan isn't JUST about how a games dynasty/franchise work. What about realistic stats? What about walks? What about stolen bases? What about LH HR's? Other games struggle with these things, but ESPN does them very well.
Comment