But I still think you could define Sutter as a career closer. As for Marshall, he started a few games here and there throughout his career, so its easy to disclude him as a "closer".
Case for the HOF: John Franco
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: Case for the HOF: John Franco
Originally posted by Squint
But I still think you could define Sutter as a career closer. As for Marshall, he started a few games here and there throughout his career, so its easy to disclude him as a "closer". -
Re: Case for the HOF: John Franco
Franco is just not good enough to make it.. they still need to let some other big name closers in the hall before even thinking of him.. & if longevity means anything, then I say let Jessie Orosco in too... yes he was a good closer for several years.. but a great one? the games stat to me is not a criteria for a pitcher - you could be brought in every day, either for one batter, one pitch, a inning, so forth & so on..
Sutter should be in not only for being an elite closer, but he also developed a pitch that is now in use in baseball..Comment
Comment