50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by Kohlstar20 -
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by camulosIt's easy to blame Selig but you have to understand he is powerless to make these kinds of changes without approval of the MLBPA. He was publicly encouraging Congress to step in to force the MLBPA into an agreement, which was really his only choice.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Kudos to congress. Selig may be powerless against the beast that is the MLBPA, but congress bent them to their will with the threat of further congressional involvement in baseball's drug problem.
Does this new stricter testing include HGH? If I'm not mistaken, the previous steroid policy didn't even check for that....Helen: Everyone's special, Dash.
Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by SkerikKudos to congress. Selig may be powerless against the beast that is the MLBPA, but congress bent them to their will with the threat of further congressional involvement in baseball's drug problem.
Does this new stricter testing include HGH? If I'm not mistaken, the previous steroid policy didn't even check for that....Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by camulosUnless they changed from a urine test to a blood test, no.Helen: Everyone's special, Dash.
Dash: [muttering] Which is another way of saying no one is.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by Kohlstar20It about time stupid a** Bud Selig got his s*** together. I was getting really angry when Selig didn't have anything in place and congress was getting ready to step in. God forbid the day congress gets involved in baseball.
THE ANTI-TRUST EXEMPTION
Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by SkerikI see. That would seem to be kind of a gaping hole in the MLB drug detection program, no?
• First positive test -- Mandatory additional testing.
• Second positive -- 25-game suspension.
• Third positive -- 80-game suspension.
• Fourth positive -- Commissioner's discretion, with an arbitrator being able to review.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by SkerikI see. That would seem to be kind of a gaping hole in the MLB drug detection program, no?
I'm pretty sure that the NFL is a urine test as well. Not sure though.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
I give props for stiffening the penalty but I still think it should be:
1st Offense - Out 1 year
2nd Offense - Banned from playing baseball for life
But at least they improved it.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Good Job!!! Ten games was a joke. Under a ten game suspension a pitcher missed 2 starts... big deal. Now they will miss ten starts, should be a good deterrent, although I would have liked it to be even more strict.Calvin- "You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help."Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by SportsmanTOSee this is my one problem with this. They could test all they want and be as strict as they want but if MLB isn't going to put money on testing facilities and procedures then what's the point? Players will find other substances that won't be spotted in the tests they're given nowadays.
At least they've got harsher penalties now tho.Comment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by ehhGreat news. Is this retroactive or in effect as of today? Or is there a future date where it's set to take effect?Cowboys - Thunder - AthleticsComment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by WolfeyeThat's not a big problem. Now how do they know it's not spotted by the tests? It used to be well if it is spotted by the test then I guess there goes 10 days. Now if you are wrong there goes 1/4th of a season. The harsh penalty alone might be enough to keep a lot of guys off the juice.
BTW here's something interesting that was stated by Steve Philips on SportsCentre here in Canada. This is in regards to amphetimines. Philips said it's a widespread problem and the reason being is that players get banged up and basically they can't go through a 162 game season without them.
He then said that training and prep for games will need to be changed or we may have to have a 120 game season if we want players to be healthy and strong enough to go for the full year.Last edited by SPTO; 11-16-2005, 07:45 AM.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
-
Re: 50 Game ban for 1st time offenders/Lifetime ban for 3rd timers
Originally posted by SportsmanTOBecause there are a lot of other substances that can't be detected unless they do blood tests which is not covered under the agreement. Urine samples can only go so far.
Think about it. If they make these things, don't you think they know the testing procedures? Don't you think they create a steroid (or masking agent for that matter) that will pass these tests? Sure they do.
As SPTO pointed out, the problem is the difference in a blood/urine sample. Urine samples are improving and getting better, but still weak. A blood test is nearly impossible to fool.Comment
Comment