Canseco back at it again

**RandyMoss84** · 03-27-2008, 10:50 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by gta95

I'm just wondering why he waited till the sequel to release all the other names. More money?

watch the nightline interview, he says something

**NYJets** · 03-27-2008, 11:26 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by RandyMoss84

says who? the thread seems to be about Canseco's new book to me

he told the truth last time why think differently of him now

Fair enough on the first point. I actually hadn't noticed that.

But it actually weakens his credibility if he accuses Clemens of doing steroids since he just came out a couple of days ago saying he doesn't think Clemens took them.

**p_rushing** · 03-28-2008, 11:03 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by RandyMoss84

watch the nightline interview, he says something

He may be telling the truth, but the guy sounds bad. He sounds like he is blackmailing everyone and everything he says about Clemens screams I got paid off or am trying to get paid. About Arod, he says the timing isn't right. So he must be giving Arod time to think about the offer or go public in a new book if Arod refuses to help him out.

I'm glad he is speaking, but I see him in the same light as MLB leadership and both need to go away.

**ehh** · 04-01-2008, 11:33 AM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Canseco was on WFAN this morning and the interview got pretty heated and Canseco eventually hung up the phone and ended the interview early.

It's at www.wfan.com if you want to listen, pretty funny.

**Blzer** · 04-01-2008, 01:17 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by ehh

Canseco was on WFAN this morning and the interview got pretty heated and Canseco eventually hung up the phone and ended the interview early.

It's at www.wfan.com if you want to listen, pretty funny.

A lot of those questions were pretty damn unnecessary, and even more inappropriate for public radio.

At the same time, they're right... he just had no backbone.

**ehh** · 04-01-2008, 02:11 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by Blzer

A lot of those questions were pretty damn unnecessary, and even more inappropriate for public radio.

At the same time, they're right... he just had no backbone.

Eh, typical NY media. Asking a man to discuss his personal finances is crossing the line though. I was surprised that Boomer went after him a little, he usually big-time brown noses any ex-athlete.

**Pared** · 04-01-2008, 02:39 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

I'd be trying to bang his wife too if I were A-Rod. Hot damn!

**ckarlic** · 04-01-2008, 02:56 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by TJdaSportsGuy

But how does Jose feel about A-Rod?

LOL

**Kashanova** · 04-01-2008, 03:58 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by ehh

Eh, typical NY media. Asking a man to discuss his personal finances is crossing the line though. I was surprised that Boomer went after him a little, he usually big-time brown noses any ex-athlete.

i would of went after canseco too, dude a dirt bag and has nothing on arod

**allBthere** · 04-01-2008, 04:23 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

canseco and i share a common hate for A-Rod...nice.

-to anyone who think bonds didn't do steroids, you're completely naive. look at his body during that movie 'the rookie', and look at it now - that doesn't happen naturally. Everyone knows he did, just like you know who does in your local gym - it's OBVIOUS

**The Chef** · 04-01-2008, 06:55 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Canseco was on Letterman last night and just sounded like an idiot. One second he is willing to say with certainty that Roger Clemens didnt use steroids because he doesnt think he would ever do that and didnt come to Jose to get them, yet at the same time he swears that Alex did them based on the fact that he introduced him to a known dealer, sounds like he picks and chooses who he is willing to give the benefit of the doubt to. Another thing that stood out to me about Jose is he seems to have a lot of pride in being the so called "hook-up" for anyone who wanted steroids, especially considering since Clemens supposendly didnt get connected through Jose then that means he couldnt possibly have gotten them anyother way I guess. The last thing I remember from last night, is this huge conspiracy theory he has against MLB, something about them trying to hide Palmeiro's positive test only to out him in court to ruin him and make themselves look better and how the MLB was trying to go after Jose as well to ruin him, now I hate Bud Selig as much as the next guy but this is starting to sound like a really bad movie script.

EDIT- Almost forgot from a different interview he did, the whole story about being in a holding cell with an informant who said that A-Rod was going around town talking trash about Jose. Now Im sure this could be true but it just seems like two different worlds that wouldnt have anything to do with eachother.

**Blzer** · 04-01-2008, 08:33 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by allBthere

canseco and i share a common hate for A-Rod...nice.

-to anyone who think bonds didn't do steroids, you're completely naive. look at his body during that movie 'the rookie', and look at it now - that doesn't happen naturally. Everyone knows he did, just like you know who does in your local gym - it's OBVIOUS

Bonds did steroids (as he has admitted, and that's as much as I'm going to believe for now), but there is zero proof in size comparisons unless it occurred overnight. Like you used a comparison during his Pittsburgh days (the movie was Rookie of the Year, BTW) which could have been as long as 17 years ago, and you're comparing him to 17 years later.

Again, not valid proof whatsoever. It could certainly be an indication since he certainly did take steroids, but as you can see, people have grown naturally that way in that span, and people that have taken steroids have also shown no growth whatsoever.

**BigDofBA** · 04-01-2008, 11:25 PM

Re: Canseco back at it again

Originally posted by Blzer

Bonds did steroids (as he has admitted, and that's as much as I'm going to believe for now), but there is zero proof in size comparisons unless it occurred overnight. Like you used a comparison during his Pittsburgh days (the movie was Rookie of the Year, BTW) which could have been as long as 17 years ago, and you're comparing him to 17 years later.

Again, not valid proof whatsoever. It could certainly be an indication since he certainly did take steroids, but as you can see, people have grown naturally that way in that span, and people that have taken steroids have also shown no growth whatsoever.

Bonds growth didn't even resemble anything natural. He put on like 25-30 lbs in one year and most of it was muscle. His head and feet grew in his late 30's. People usually start shrinking in their lat 30's and early 40's. HGH can increase bone mass as well, thus the bigger head and bigger feet.

It's not like Bonds put on all this muscle over a 17 year span. It happend pretty rapidly toward the end of his career.

**ehh** · 04-02-2008, 09:47 AM

Re: Canseco back at it again

WFAN reported that Canseco was at a book signing yesterday and said he believes A-Rod had an affair with his wife.

This guy is an *******.

**Pared** · 04-02-2008, 10:02 AM

Re: Canseco back at it again

After hearing that interview with the FAN, it's not a shocker to hear them dragging him through the mud and reporting every little thing he says or does.

Canseco back at it again

Recommended Videos

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment