Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

Mo Vaugn should not be playing CF...so I agrree...if the game lets him play CF and a very good one, I dont think I want this game

[Lando33]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

What kind of freakin loser uses his review space to rank on a pro baseball player? Talk about irresponsible. I do see his attempted point about the game and that's all well and good. But to disguise a poor review within a purely stupid rant is just plain dumb. Mo's a former MVP in the twilight of his career. As stated about, he did lose 40 lbs and if anyone watched MO game in and game out like I did last year, they know that there is a glimmer of hope going into the 2003 season that Mo can return to his AL MVP form.

[Lando33]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

What kind of freakin loser uses his review space to rank on a pro baseball player? Talk about irresponsible. I do see his attempted point about the game and that's all well and good. But to disguise a poor review within a purely stupid rant is just plain dumb. Mo's a former MVP in the twilight of his career. As stated about, he did lose 40 lbs and if anyone watched MO game in and game out like I did last year, they know that there is a glimmer of hope going into the 2003 season that Mo can return to his AL MVP form.

[CheckMate]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Mo Vaugn should not be playing CF...so I agrree...if the game lets him play CF and a very good one, I dont think I want this game

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

But wouldn't you ask yourself why they put him in CF in the first place.

I could put a WR at QB and run the option all day long in NCAA 03 and then bash the game by saying that the CPU can't stop the option. But would I have a valid arguement?

[CheckMate]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
Mo Vaugn should not be playing CF...so I agrree...if the game lets him play CF and a very good one, I dont think I want this game

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

But wouldn't you ask yourself why they put him in CF in the first place.

I could put a WR at QB and run the option all day long in NCAA 03 and then bash the game by saying that the CPU can't stop the option. But would I have a valid arguement?

[paulywerner]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BTW - PaulyWerner, what part of NYC do you live in?? Cause, Queens doesnt smell no where near as bad as SI or the Bronx(which I happen to reside in).

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I live in Howard Beach, Queens(near JFK).... It only smells bad near Shea Stadium, the rest of it is actually pretty tolerable, but you're right, Staten Island is pretty bad, mostly because half of it is a garbage dump. I dont go to the Bronx other than Yankee Stadium, so wouldnt know how it smells up there... All I know is the Stadium hot dogs make that area smell pretty good

[paulywerner]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
BTW - PaulyWerner, what part of NYC do you live in?? Cause, Queens doesnt smell no where near as bad as SI or the Bronx(which I happen to reside in).

<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

I live in Howard Beach, Queens(near JFK).... It only smells bad near Shea Stadium, the rest of it is actually pretty tolerable, but you're right, Staten Island is pretty bad, mostly because half of it is a garbage dump. I dont go to the Bronx other than Yankee Stadium, so wouldnt know how it smells up there... All I know is the Stadium hot dogs make that area smell pretty good

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

but why should a game let a player play another position he's not even familar with at 100% effectiveness with no penalties or limitations on his abilities???

Then we could simply just draft a team full of the most potent hitters and play them at any position to create an all star team!?

how is this not important in a game?....there is no excuse for this

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

but why should a game let a player play another position he's not even familar with at 100% effectiveness with no penalties or limitations on his abilities???

Then we could simply just draft a team full of the most potent hitters and play them at any position to create an all star team!?

how is this not important in a game?....there is no excuse for this

[StriderNo9]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

I'm very close to you in Woodhaven, Queens. And yes this has to be one of the worst reviews I ever read. I only laughed once at the death comment, but still I mean damn learn to write a review dolt.

[StriderNo9]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

I'm very close to you in Woodhaven, Queens. And yes this has to be one of the worst reviews I ever read. I only laughed once at the death comment, but still I mean damn learn to write a review dolt.

[Dice]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

It's funny how they made the Mo Vaughn reference as far as his defense because in a Spring Training game yesterday he made a "Mark Grace" type catch at first base. So Mo isn't a bad a fielder as the review says he is.

[Dice]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

It's funny how they made the Mo Vaughn reference as far as his defense because in a Spring Training game yesterday he made a "Mark Grace" type catch at first base. So Mo isn't a bad a fielder as the review says he is.

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

well what happens when he starts to make these catches in cf?...is that ok with you?

[**DONOTDELETE**]

Re: Gamers.com gives mvp a 7

well what happens when he starts to make these catches in cf?...is that ok with you?