Yes I agree that his point was on target. But it was only on target because I chose to compare stats between Hamilton and Dunn. With Hamilton having that many more opportunities to hit a player in than Dunn, then it is logical he would have more RBI's.
BUT..the point of the debate was not about how many RBI's Hamilton had over Dunn. It was about Dunn's ability, or lack thereof, to be successful at getting players in.
If you guys would stop arguing over something that is no longer being debated (whether or not Dunn is valuable), then you would see the debate. I will go over it one more time since most of you keep ignoring it.
agonytheclown said,
"Dunn has power, and that's it. For all the homeruns and RBI's he knocks in, I don't remember the last time I saw a slugger with such a poor RISP stat. His HR-RBI ratio has to be a historical low. And the guy is a loser mentality. Maybe having his buddy Junior gone will put his back against the wall."
to which Sandman42 responded:
"Dunn's OPS w/ RISP:
2005 - 1.042
2006 - .923
2007 - .814
2008 - .967
Try again."
to which I argued that OPS w/RISP for Dunn is skewed because his OBP is so high. I said he isn't great at getting runners in. I agreed that he is good at keeping an inning alive, but he is not great at hitting a runner in.
Coug00 showed us a metric that proves exactly that.
Now if you can debate this fact, without bringing in the fact that Dunn is valuable (because I am not debating that), then I give you the floor.
Can someone, anyone show me that I am wrong that Dunn is not great at hitting players in that are in scoring position?<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
<!-- / message --><!-- Google Postbit Ads for Guests Only -->
Comment