I don't really believe that A-Rod only took steroids from 2001-2003. From 1999-2003 seems more like it. That's around the time when people saw what type of fanfare, celebrity, and money roided guys like Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa were getting after the memorable summer of 1998. It seems like 1998-2000 was when steroids really became mainstream for players. But if he says 2001-2003 then I'll take him at his word. Even though, he would have NEVER come out and said anything if he wasn't exposed. I just can't believe that if those tests were destroyed the public would have NEVER known anything and A-Rod would continue to be one of the greatest "clean" hitters ever. The ironic thing is that he probably was WITHOUT the roids. I have to commend A-Rod for at least treating the public like it has some type of intelligence and not lying to us further like Bonds or Clemens. I do think that he's probably been clean since he's been a Yankee. But it's just hard to imagine how the "pressure" that made him take roids in Texas even compares to New York. Maybe just the aura of being a Yankee, how important it is, and the growing sentiment against steroids in 2003 made him think "OK, I have to do this clean." With all that being said, let's face it, his 2007 was his greatest season and one of the best hitting seasons in the history of baseball. And according to the rules, he was clean. Even if you take out those three years from 2001-2003, he's still a first ballot HOFer.
A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
Collapse
Recommended Videos
Collapse
X
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
I don't really believe that A-Rod only took steroids from 2001-2003. From 1999-2003 seems more like it. That's around the time when people saw what type of fanfare, celebrity, and money roided guys like Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa were getting after the memorable summer of 1998. It seems like 1998-2000 was when steroids really became mainstream for players. But if he says 2001-2003 then I'll take him at his word. Even though, he would have NEVER come out and said anything if he wasn't exposed. I just can't believe that if those tests were destroyed the public would have NEVER known anything and A-Rod would continue to be one of the greatest "clean" hitters ever. The ironic thing is that he probably was WITHOUT the roids. I have to commend A-Rod for at least treating the public like it has some type of intelligence and not lying to us further like Bonds or Clemens. I do think that he's probably been clean since he's been a Yankee. But it's just hard to imagine how the "pressure" that made him take roids in Texas even compares to New York. Maybe just the aura of being a Yankee, how important it is, and the growing sentiment against steroids in 2003 made him think "OK, I have to do this clean." With all that being said, let's face it, his 2007 was his greatest season and one of the best hitting seasons in the history of baseball. And according to the rules, he was clean. Even if you take out those three years from 2001-2003, he's still a first ballot HOFer. -
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
You got me. I have no idea what the heck you're trying to say.
Alex admitted to using from 2001-2003.
I merely mentioned that as long as Alex admits to using then he's taking the right step. Then you get on me because you're saying he'd be lying if he said only one year. That really wasn't the point of my comment.
But, you probably know my point better than me since you've been right time and time again about everything.
You responded to me saying "Do you really believe Pettitte only took HGH once" Even though I posted that they all lie and will only admit to what they get caught with red-handed. Your response implied that I believed that even though I said the opposite. So I guess you really didn't get what I was trying to say, no harm, no foul.
I posted a picture of A-Rod a couple of weeks ago showing fatty deposits in his chest like an anabolic user and that combined with his stats I would have to say if push comes to shove, yes, he's a user, even with no "hard" proof. Which we have now.
I've had these conversations going back well over a decade knowing full well who was on drugs and surmising with friends about when we would know. The best we could figure was that if their suppliers were busted would be the only way we would ever have proof because TESTING IS A JOKE.
As it turned out BALCO got busted and names turned up, doctors got busted and names turned up, etc. "Testing" only exposed the dummies who were dumb enough to get caught.Comment
-
Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
Clemens let his trainer inject his naked wife's *** with HGH but Clemens didn't do it. LMAO. Yeah right.Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
It pains me to think Mcgwire did it. I have even rationalized to myself why he was the one guy who could have been clean. He went from 215 as a rookie to 250 or 260 that's possible not 180 or 190 to 250 like Bonds. Even though i know he probably isn't So I understand why you wouldn't want to believe Clemens juiced but that is just being unrealistic thinking Clemens didn't do it. Pettite did it and admitted Mcnamme was right but he's lying about Clemens, Mcnamee shot up Clemens wife but not him, dna on the syringes, He's going to get nailed on perjury charges sooner or later.Last edited by vernond; 02-09-2009, 03:07 PM.Comment
-
***My Teams***
NCAA - Oklahoma Sooners
MLB - St. Louis Cardinals
NFL - Dallas Cowboys
NBA - Oklahoma City ThunderComment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
You've seen the names of those things. Seems logical that he would forget what they were called."It may well be that we spectators, who are not divinely gifted as athletes, are the only ones able to truly see, articulate and animate the experience of the gift we are denied. And that those who receive and act out the gift of athletic genius must, perforce, be blind and dumb about it -- and not because blindness and dumbness are the price of the gift, but because they are its essence." - David Foster Wallace
"You'll not find more penny-wise/pound-foolish behavior than in Major League Baseball." - Rob NeyerComment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
I heard something interesting on the radio today from a legal expert on one of the sports talk shows here in Chicago.
He proposed that rather than having an asterisk next to the modern day players names we do it to the old time player's (sometime before the 1980's) names, stating that they were accomplishing these type of stats without the cloud of steroids over their head...basically noting it was a pre-steroid era.
He went on to say that, if asterisks are put next to players names during the steroid era that most players would file suit against Cooperstown and could end up in uneeded litigation and long drawn out legal battles.
Just throwing that out there, even though its far-fetched...interesting idea though.Last edited by ezekiel55; 02-09-2009, 03:14 PM.Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
I also don't buy the fact he didn't even know he tested positive until he was told this weekend so that means he wasn't lying to Katie Couric because he didn't know the truth and he didn't know for sure what he was taking because it was such a "loose" culture. That's what i find to be the biggest lie of all. The only truth you're gonna get out of these guys is the one thing they are caught on. This is all just my opinion of course.
Because he didn't know for sure if he passed or failed the test, that means he wasn't lying to Couric about taking steroids? That doesn't make sense.
1. He didn't know if he passed or failed. That seems to make sense since the testing was anonymous. MLB isn't going to go to the guy and say, "You failed." They weren't supposed to know.
2. He told Couric that he lied to himself about taking steroids so he was obviously going to lie to her.
Not sure how those two things are directly related at all."It may well be that we spectators, who are not divinely gifted as athletes, are the only ones able to truly see, articulate and animate the experience of the gift we are denied. And that those who receive and act out the gift of athletic genius must, perforce, be blind and dumb about it -- and not because blindness and dumbness are the price of the gift, but because they are its essence." - David Foster Wallace
"You'll not find more penny-wise/pound-foolish behavior than in Major League Baseball." - Rob NeyerComment
-
Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
It pains me to think Mcgwire did it. I have even rationalized to myself why he was the one guy who could have been clean. He went from 215 as a rookie to 250 or 260 that's possible not 180 or 190 to 250 like Bonds. Even though i know he probably isn't So I understand why you wouldn't want to believe Clemens juiced but that is just being realistic thinking Clemens didn't do it. Pettite did it and admitted Mcnamme was right but he's lying about Clemens, Mcnamee shot up Clemens wife but not him, dna on the syringes, He's going to get nailed on perjury charges sooner or later.
I wish I had a nickel for every time I've read/heard going back at least 20 years about such and such athlete putting on 20-30 pounds of pure muscle in the offseason, impossible without juicing. Also the bragging of such and such athlete who is down to a certain percent of body fat in his 30's. To me they were just screaming, "I'm doing steroids now!" To most people it was wow, great job, these new "training methods" are unbelievable, "guys really watch what they eat now" etc.Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
I'm confused.
Because he didn't know for sure if he passed or failed the test, that means he wasn't lying to Couric about taking steroids? That doesn't make sense.
1. He didn't know if he passed or failed. That seems to make sense since the testing was anonymous. MLB isn't going to go to the guy and say, "You failed." They weren't supposed to know.
2. He told Couric that he lied to himself about taking steroids so he was obviously going to lie to her.
Not sure how those two things are directly related at all.Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
"To be quite honest, I don't know exactly what substance I was guilty of using," Rodriguez said.Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
I'm sure Manny, Ortiz, Piazza, Belle, Thome are/were all "clean".
Give me a break.
Have you ever actually seen a picture of Manny Ramirez in 1993 or 1994? The $hitstorm is just beginning. Just watch.Last edited by spyder23; 02-09-2009, 03:17 PM.Comment
-
Re: A-Rod tested positive for 'roids in '03
At least A-Rod came out and told (mostly) the truth today. I don't think he's going to get the free pass that Giambi and Pettite got though. This guy was supposed to be the knight in shining armor for MLB and then he craps all over that possibility with this. I still think he's going to face a ton of scrutiny and I wouldn't be surprised to see him have a sub par year as he's the kind of guy that lets outside pressure get to him.Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. ParkerComment
Comment