</font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
I by no means think the game is ugly. For one it has the best looking ballparks out of all the games IMO.
The rest is sub-par and overall it doesn't look as good as the rest, but I don't find it ugly.
<hr /></blockquote><font class="post">
Well, "ugly" is subjective of course. But after playing WSB 2K3/HH at 480p, and starting off IP with the "behind the pitcher" cam, first impressions were like a very bad blind-date

The behind the batter cam looks much better, and I agree that the parks look nice. And the lighting affect for night games is cool. So it is not all bad. But the jaggies are awful, the player models are "stumpy" like NFL Fever, and the scrolling (when the ball is hit) is not very smooth in my opinion.
But I do realize that this game's strength is online play. I was just pointing out that reviews (not just the OS review) that says "IP's graphics are not quite as nice as the other games" are being pretty generous.
I am talking "overall graphic look", not tiny ballpark details. I think they really dropped the ball by not offering 480p support. WSB2k3/HH do support 480p and it makes the graphics a *lot* cleaner.
Comment