MLB All-Star game....

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BigRed
    MVP
    • May 2003
    • 1683

    #16
    Re: MLB All-Star game....

    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
    I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

    What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

    That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

    It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

    Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

    This, is why the game was called a tie.

    Don't blame Bud.

    Red.
    Pecos Pete

    Comment

    • Karlos05
      -
      • Mar 2003
      • 5814

      #17
      Re: MLB All-Star game....

      Home field advantage for the winning league can only help the All-Star game and I think it will. It's a good idea I hope they still use it after this 2 year "experiment"

      Comment

      • Karlos05
        -
        • Mar 2003
        • 5814

        #18
        Re: MLB All-Star game....

        Home field advantage for the winning league can only help the All-Star game and I think it will. It's a good idea I hope they still use it after this 2 year "experiment"

        Comment

        • Karlos05
          -
          • Mar 2003
          • 5814

          #19
          Re: MLB All-Star game....

          Home field advantage for the winning league can only help the All-Star game and I think it will. It's a good idea I hope they still use it after this 2 year "experiment"

          Comment

          • skitch
            Fear Ameer
            • Oct 2002
            • 12349

            #20
            Re: MLB All-Star game....

            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
            I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

            That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

            It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

            Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

            This, is why the game was called a tie.

            Don't blame Bud.

            Red.

            <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

            I'm not really saying it was the wrong thing to do, I'm just saying that critics who wanted to see the game finished will never let Selig hear the end of it..

            Comment

            • skitch
              Fear Ameer
              • Oct 2002
              • 12349

              #21
              Re: MLB All-Star game....

              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
              I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

              That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

              It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

              Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

              This, is why the game was called a tie.

              Don't blame Bud.

              Red.

              <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

              I'm not really saying it was the wrong thing to do, I'm just saying that critics who wanted to see the game finished will never let Selig hear the end of it..

              Comment

              • skitch
                Fear Ameer
                • Oct 2002
                • 12349

                #22
                Re: MLB All-Star game....

                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

                That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

                It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

                Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

                This, is why the game was called a tie.

                Don't blame Bud.

                Red.

                <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                I'm not really saying it was the wrong thing to do, I'm just saying that critics who wanted to see the game finished will never let Selig hear the end of it..

                Comment

                • kweiss
                  MVP
                  • May 2003
                  • 1886

                  #23
                  Re: MLB All-Star game....

                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                  I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

                  That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

                  It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

                  Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

                  This, is why the game was called a tie.

                  Don't blame Bud.

                  Red.

                  <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                  They could have done something like a home run derby. Then there would atleast be a winner. Sort of like a shoot out in hockey. Just an idea.

                  Comment

                  • kweiss
                    MVP
                    • May 2003
                    • 1886

                    #24
                    Re: MLB All-Star game....

                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                    I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

                    That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

                    It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

                    Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

                    This, is why the game was called a tie.

                    Don't blame Bud.

                    Red.

                    <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                    They could have done something like a home run derby. Then there would atleast be a winner. Sort of like a shoot out in hockey. Just an idea.

                    Comment

                    • kweiss
                      MVP
                      • May 2003
                      • 1886

                      #25
                      Re: MLB All-Star game....

                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      </font><blockquote><font class="small">Quote:</font><hr />
                      I think it is a good idea too. Anything so we won't have another tie. That was one of the most disappointing things I have ever seen.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      I agree. Bud Selig will never hear the end of it for calling that game . .

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      What was Bud supposed to do? Pitch?

                      That game being called a tie was a direct reflection of the players' attitudes towards the thing.

                      It used to not need to have "something" on the line to be important. Guys used to fight it out 'tooth-and-nail' to win the thing for 'braggin' rights'.

                      Unfortunately, players nowadays are happy to get that bonus, show up for a couple innings and be at dinner before the game is even over.

                      This, is why the game was called a tie.

                      Don't blame Bud.

                      Red.

                      <hr /></blockquote><font class="post">

                      They could have done something like a home run derby. Then there would atleast be a winner. Sort of like a shoot out in hockey. Just an idea.

                      Comment

                      Working...