UZR: Thoughts?

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • snepp
    We'll waste him too.
    • Apr 2003
    • 10007

    #16
    Re: UZR: Thoughts?

    Originally posted by Coug00
    There would be no reason not to move him up the "list". I still do not understand why you think SABR folks on this board have some sort of personal vendetta against Ryan Howard.

    You should see the responses I get from Twins fans when I try to argue that Morneau is barely a top 10 first baseman, it's not pretty.
    Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

    Comment

    • P2K
      Banned
      • Aug 2006
      • 8845

      #17
      Re: UZR: Thoughts?

      Originally posted by Coug00
      There would be no reason not to move him up the "list". I still do not understand why you think SABR folks on this board have some sort of personal vendetta against Ryan Howard.
      Well, we know one does (Ewing). But the rest of you are fair.

      I don't see what was the need to bring up Howard. I'll let JBH3 sink by his lonely on this one

      Comment

      • JBH3
        Marvel's Finest
        • Jan 2007
        • 13506

        #18
        Re: UZR: Thoughts?

        Originally posted by P2K
        Well, we know one does (Ewing). But the rest of you are fair.

        I don't see what was the need to bring up Howard. I'll let JBH3 sink by his lonely on this one
        The reason for me mentioning Howard, at least his defensive placement in the OP, was the fact that what I was seeing with my own two eyes this year translated into a pretty good defensive year from on otherwise paltry-classified defensive 1B.

        However, during the times in which I was saying this, it was dismissed as homerism and bias because I'm not watching Howard and Teixiera every night so how do I know who's better defensively?

        Howard improved greatly in the field this past year, I think that's illustrated here, and I think I was right when I was giving my 'bias' outlook in that infamous Ryan Howard thread.
        Originally posted by Edmund Burke
        All that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.

        Comment

        • Coug00
          LOB
          • Jul 2002
          • 3476

          #19
          Re: UZR: Thoughts?

          Originally posted by JBH3
          The reason for me mentioning Howard, at least his defensive placement in the OP, was the fact that what I was seeing with my own two eyes this year translated into a pretty good defensive year from on otherwise paltry-classified defensive 1B.

          However, during the times in which I was saying this, it was dismissed as homerism and bias because I'm not watching Howard and Teixiera every night so how do I know who's better defensively?

          Howard improved greatly in the field this past year, I think that's illustrated here, and I think I was right when I was giving my 'bias' outlook in that infamous Ryan Howard thread.
          Since you're using UZR as justification for your opinion of Howard's defensive improvement, there's one small little problem...

          2008 UZR - 2.4
          2009 UZR - 1.2
          Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

          Comment

          • TheLetterZ
            All Star
            • Jul 2002
            • 6752

            #20
            Re: UZR: Thoughts?

            My eyes also tell me that Howard improved defensively this past year. Again, I don't think UZR measures first basemen well.

            Comment

            • Coug00
              LOB
              • Jul 2002
              • 3476

              #21
              Re: UZR: Thoughts?

              Originally posted by TheLetterZ
              My eyes also tell me that Howard improved defensively this past year. Again, I don't think UZR measures first basemen well.
              Exactly, but you're not attempting to use UZR to prove you're right over long dead disagreements.
              Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

              Comment

              • JBH3
                Marvel's Finest
                • Jan 2007
                • 13506

                #22
                Re: UZR: Thoughts?

                Originally posted by Coug00
                Exactly, but you're not attempting to use UZR to prove you're right over long dead disagreements.
                ...your point?
                Last edited by JBH3; 12-04-2009, 01:18 PM.
                Originally posted by Edmund Burke
                All that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.

                Comment

                • snepp
                  We'll waste him too.
                  • Apr 2003
                  • 10007

                  #23
                  Re: UZR: Thoughts?

                  Let sleeping dogs lie?
                  Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                  Comment

                  • Coug00
                    LOB
                    • Jul 2002
                    • 3476

                    #24
                    Re: UZR: Thoughts?

                    Originally posted by JBH3
                    ...your point?
                    In this thread you used UZR as a justification for your opinion on Ryan Howard's defense. That means you believe UZR for 1B is acceptable.

                    If that's the case, then you're flat out wrong because UZR says he regressed from 2008 to 2009.

                    If that's not the case, I have no idea why you brought Ryan Howard up, again.
                    Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                    Comment

                    • JBH3
                      Marvel's Finest
                      • Jan 2007
                      • 13506

                      #25
                      Re: UZR: Thoughts?

                      Originally posted by snepp
                      Let sleeping dogs lie?
                      The idea that the Howard thread was a dead argument is untrue. The thread was locked, and had no resolution.

                      Have you or Coug ever felt compelled to defend someone? Take the Elton Brand thread in the NBA forum as another example similar to this Ryan Howard thread. I got tired of posting in there on a nightly basis, I'll just update his numbers at the end of each month, to illustrate the OP was wrong.

                      So like that example, and this one here...where Howards fielding from first is recognized as 8th best in the league I feel compelled to argue his uh I guess 'status'. Especially since my personal view was dimissed on the grounds that I didn't watch Tex or whomever play. I didn't need to see Tex play to at least know Ryan Howard is an at least "good" defensive first basemen, now.
                      Originally posted by Edmund Burke
                      All that is needed for the triumph of evil, is for good men to do nothing.

                      Comment

                      • Misfit
                        All Star
                        • Mar 2003
                        • 5766

                        #26
                        Re: UZR: Thoughts?

                        Its my belief that UZR, like most stats, is best applied when looking at career numbers and not seasonal ones. The largest sample size should always be used when available. Its also probably true that UZR cannot accurately measure the defensive capabilities of a first baseman. Is Derek Jeter all of a sudden an 8.4 player? No, while I think its fair to say he improved his defense in 2009, he's still closer to the -4.6 career defender he has been versus the 8.4 player he allegedly became.

                        Comment

                        • Coug00
                          LOB
                          • Jul 2002
                          • 3476

                          #27
                          Re: UZR: Thoughts?

                          Originally posted by Misfit
                          Its my belief that UZR, like most stats, is best applied when looking at career numbers and not seasonal ones. The largest sample size should always be used when available. Its also probably true that UZR cannot accurately measure the defensive capabilities of a first baseman. Is Derek Jeter all of a sudden an 8.4 player? No, while I think its fair to say he improved his defense in 2009, he's still closer to the -4.6 career defender he has been versus the 8.4 player he allegedly became.
                          Great post. Agree completely. I saw a sample size comparison somewhere this past summer and it basically said 3 years of UZR data is the equivalent to one year of data at the plate.

                          Originally posted by JBH3
                          The idea that the Howard thread was a dead argument is untrue. The thread was locked, and had no resolution.

                          Have you or Coug ever felt compelled to defend someone? Take the Elton Brand thread in the NBA forum as another example similar to this Ryan Howard thread. I got tired of posting in there on a nightly basis, I'll just update his numbers at the end of each month, to illustrate the OP was wrong.

                          So like that example, and this one here...where Howards fielding from first is recognized as 8th best in the league I feel compelled to argue his uh I guess 'status'. Especially since my personal view was dimissed on the grounds that I didn't watch Tex or whomever play. I didn't need to see Tex play to at least know Ryan Howard is an at least "good" defensive first basemen, now.
                          The problem is, until Ryan Howard significantly improves or declines, no one is going to change the other's mind. Until then, its just spinning tires in the mud.
                          Member of The OS Baseball Rocket Scientists Association

                          Comment

                          Working...