Great players by position

Collapse

Recommended Videos

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CabreraMVP
    MVP
    • Sep 2010
    • 1437

    #16
    Re: Great players by position

    Is Pudge the best catcher of all time? Steroids or not, he was a strong power hitter for almost a decade. A career .298 hitter over 20 years. Too many Gold gloves to count. His defensive ability is second to none.
    JayElectronicaBluElzhi2PacTheNotoriousB.I.G.ReksSc arfaceFashawnJeruThaDamaja

    Comment

    • Knight165
      *ll St*r
      • Feb 2003
      • 24964

      #17
      Re: Great players by position

      Originally posted by CabreraMVP
      Is Pudge the best catcher of all time? Steroids or not, he was a strong power hitter for almost a decade. A career .298 hitter over 20 years. Too many Gold gloves to count. His defensive ability is second to none.
      Nah...
      Bench was at least equal to Pudge as far as defense and was a better hitter IMO if you factor in that one played in the heavily pitcher favored 70's and the other in the hitter friendly 90's-00's.

      Pudge is a very good player for sure...but Bench redefined catching during his stretch.

      Heck....I know I'll cause a bit of a stir here...but

      Bench
      Berra
      Piazza
      Fisk
      Campy/Cochrane(take your pick)
      and THEN
      Pudge

      M.K.
      Knight165
      All gave some. Some gave all. 343

      Comment

      • st0rmb11
        All Star
        • Nov 2008
        • 5167

        #18
        Re: Great players by position

        My feeling is that Piazza is the best hitting catcher ever, Pudge and Bench are the best defensive catchers. Pudge because of how dominant he was behind the plate, and Bench for revolutionizing the way catchers caught and played defense.

        Cincinnati Reds

        UNC Tarheels

        Twitter: @st0rmb11

        PS4

        Comment

        • Sportsforever
          NL MVP
          • Mar 2005
          • 20368

          #19
          Re: Great players by position

          Originally posted by Knight165
          Nah...
          Bench was at least equal to Pudge as far as defense and was a better hitter IMO if you factor in that one played in the heavily pitcher favored 70's and the other in the hitter friendly 90's-00's.

          Pudge is a very good player for sure...but Bench redefined catching during his stretch.

          Heck....I know I'll cause a bit of a stir here...but

          Bench
          Berra
          Piazza
          Fisk
          Campy/Cochrane(take your pick)
          and THEN
          Pudge

          M.K.
          Knight165
          I'd actually put Campy in front of Fisk/Cochrane. His career was cut short by racism and paralysis or he would have put up awesome numbers. He was as good as it got behind the plate and while Ebbets surely helped his numbers, he was a great hitter.

          I know he never played MLB, but I would put Gibson behind Bench. He was considered an average defender, but probably the best hitting catcher of all time.
          "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

          Comment

          • steelcurtain311
            Banned
            • Feb 2009
            • 2087

            #20
            Re: Great players by position

            Even with the injuries, I'd still rank Scott Rolen ahead of just about anybody I've seen in my lifetime at 3rd. He can still get it done now, but when he was at his peak, nobody could beat his defense+offense output. Crazy defensive talent who could hit, too. A-Rod's defense gets overrated to hell, because of his offense, which I somewhat understand. As a third baseman, he can't touch Rolen.

            Comment

            • elTodd
              Little Big Puig
              • Feb 2004
              • 1333

              #21
              Re: Great players by position

              Originally posted by steelcurtain311
              Even with the injuries, I'd still rank Scott Rolen ahead of just about anybody I've seen in my lifetime at 3rd. He can still get it done now, but when he was at his peak, nobody could beat his defense+offense output. Crazy defensive talent who could hit, too. A-Rod's defense gets overrated to hell, because of his offense, which I somewhat understand. As a third baseman, he can't touch Rolen.
              Scott Rolen still can flash the leather better than anybody in the league today. Such a great guy too. Hate the way the Cardinals treated him at the end of his stay here.

              Comment

              • 12
                Banned
                • Feb 2010
                • 4458

                #22
                Re: Great players by position

                Originally posted by EnigmaNemesis
                How could you NOT have the greatest hitter of all time, Ted Williams
                Yeah, this baffled me as well. Williams was nothing special with the glove, but he was the greatest hitter of all-time. The guy missed nearly FIVE FULL SEASONS in his prime (ages 24-28, and 34) because he was off flying planes for the Navy in WW2 and the Korean War.

                He still hit 521 bombs, has a career average of .344 and had nearly 2,700 hits.

                That's beyond insane. That's just stupid good. How anyone could leave him off an all-time greats list is beyond me. The guy's life goal was to be called the "Greatest hitter who ever lived," and he achieved it.

                Teddy Ballgame was the man. Maybe it's just because I don't like him, but I don't think Bonds touches him in terms of overall production. Take five years away from Bonds, when he was in his absolute prime, and he's not even in the discussion.

                Comment

                • Sportsforever
                  NL MVP
                  • Mar 2005
                  • 20368

                  #23
                  Re: Great players by position

                  Originally posted by Apostle
                  Yeah, this baffled me as well. Williams was nothing special with the glove, but he was the greatest hitter of all-time. The guy missed nearly FIVE FULL SEASONS in his prime (ages 24-28, and 34) because he was off flying planes for the Navy in WW2 and the Korean War.

                  He still hit 521 bombs, has a career average of .344 and had nearly 2,700 hits.

                  That's beyond insane. That's just stupid good. How anyone could leave him off an all-time greats list is beyond me. The guy's life goal was to be called the "Greatest hitter who ever lived," and he achieved it.

                  Teddy Ballgame was the man. Maybe it's just because I don't like him, but I don't think Bonds touches him in terms of overall production. Take five years away from Bonds, when he was in his absolute prime, and he's not even in the discussion.
                  I actually like Williams and don't care for Bonds. Williams numbers completely justify taking him over Bonds (William's normal seasons look like Bond's roid seasons without the homers). I took Bonds because in my mind he was the TOTAL package. Yes, Williams is probably the greatest hitter of all time, but Williams is middle of the pack to below par on the bases and in the field and Bonds was the one of the best ever at both.

                  I have no problem with saying Williams is the best ever...that's the point of the discussion.
                  "People ask me what I do in winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring." - Rogers Hornsby

                  Comment

                  • 12
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2010
                    • 4458

                    #24
                    Re: Great players by position

                    I see the point with Bonds, but the steroids issue makes his accomplishments so much less impressive, in my opinion.

                    He was pretty damn good with the leather and did steal a lot bases early on, but it's still not enough for me to put him on the list.

                    I'm not saying you or anyone else is wrong... It's just my thoughts.

                    Bonds aside, I still can't get over the fact that Teddy Ballgame missed nearly five years in his absolute prime and still put up the numbers that he did. It just literally boggles my mind.

                    He would have hit at least 700 home runs and had close to 4,000 hits if he never missed that time.

                    Amazing.

                    Comment

                    • EnigmaNemesis
                      Animal Liberation
                      • Apr 2006
                      • 12216

                      #25
                      Thus why he is the greatest hitter to ever live.

                      There is a reason his book about hitting is highly regarded like a "hitting bible" or "art of
                      war to hitting" to ball players.


                      Sent from the dugout using Tapatalk
                      Boston Red Sox | Miami Dolphins

                      Comment

                      Working...