My Joe Morgan baseball i.q. is telling me that there isn't enough information to decide between the two. Without knowing their scrappiness, how can I be expected to pick the better player?
If isolated power was the same, I would go for Player A. But this isn't the case, so I'll go for Player B. This is pretty tough though, because I like a player's ability to move runners over more than one base when getting their base hits. But you can't discredit someone for drawing their walks either.
Samsung PN60F8500 PDP / Anthem MRX 720 / Klipsch RC-62 II / Klipsch RF-82 II (x2) / Insignia NS-B2111 (x2) / SVS PC13-Ultra / SVS SB-2000 / Sony MDR-7506 Professional / Audio-Technica ATH-R70x / Sony PS3 & PS4 / DirecTV HR44-500 / DarbeeVision DVP-5000 / Panamax M5400-PM / Elgato HD60
My Joe Morgan baseball i.q. is telling me that there isn't enough information to decide between the two. Without knowing their scrappiness, how can I be expected to pick the better player?
Spoiler
And you forget that being on the "Big Red Machine" has a curve to it as well.
Looking at the numbers i'm guessing Player A hits more HRs than player B. If that's the case he's probably in the 3-6 spots in the lineup and thus probably have better RBI numbers than Player A.
Spoiler
How do you figure that? Looking at the numbers, it's 99% likely that Player B is a better HR hitter, not Player A. The closer a hitter's batting average is to his slugging percentage, the higher the percentage of his hits are singles.
Originally posted by Thrash13
Dr. Jones was right in stating that. We should have believed him.
Originally posted by slickdtc
DrJones brings the stinky cheese is what we've all learned from this debacle.
Originally posted by Kipnis22
yes your fantasy world when your proven wrong about 95% of your post
How do you figure that? Looking at the numbers, it's 99% likely that Player B is a better HR hitter, not Player A. The closer a hitter's batting average is to his slugging percentage, the higher the percentage of his hits are singles.
Spoiler
That was a boo boo I meant player A in my first sentence.
Member of the Official OS Bills Backers Club
"Baseball is the most important thing that doesn't matter at all" - Robert B. Parker
Player B. I think the player who gets on base more helps out the team more.
Spoiler
In theory, yes. The more a lineup turns over. However, I put more weight on the batting average as that means a hit which means if a runner is in scoring position a run will coincide...so if there was a man on 2nd w/2 out, it doesn't mean 1st and 2nd with 2 out it would mean man on 1st +1 run.
Originally posted by Gibson88
Anyone who asked for an ETA is not being Master of their Domain.
It's hard though...especially when I got my neighbor playing their franchise across the street...maybe I will occupy myself with Glamore Magazine.
In theory, yes. The more a lineup turns over. However, I put more weight on the batting average as that means a hit which means if a runner is in scoring position a run will coincide...so if there was a man on 2nd w/2 out, it doesn't mean 1st and 2nd with 2 out it would mean man on 1st +1 run.
Spoiler
True. If the rest of your lineup can't hit getting on base doesn't help much.
I voted for Player A because a .250 BA and a .300 BA is a huge difference. Of course, the OBP is higher for Player A, butI still have to go with the higher BA
Comment